- The Iran war is entering a more uncertain phase as economic pressure fails to produce the political limits markets once expected. - JPMorgan says Brent above $100, record diesel prices and shrinking inventories have still not forced a settlement, while global oil stocks have proved far more resilient than feared. - The greatest danger is now prolonged conflict exhausting those buffers as risk spreads from Hormuz to Bab el-Mandeb, Saudi infrastructure, and Russian refineries. - President Donald Trump is meanwhile considering renewed large-scale strikes on Iran while maintaining elevated U.S. forces across the region and consulting Gulf leaders. - Tehran is preparing for the same possibility, launching 1,000 civilian resistance battalions and claiming hundreds of thousands of volunteers. - Washington is simultaneously deepening Gulf military ties, approving a potential $24.3 billion sale of 48 F-35s to Saudi Arabia. - Russia and China have vetoed continued UN sanctions monitoring on Iran. - In Europe, Russia's continuing attacks on Ukraine are accelerating NATO preparations. - Germany is readying civilian hospitals for mass wartime casualties, Britain is urging household emergency preparedness, and Washington and Warsaw are advancing plans for a permanent U.S. Army base in Poland. |
Center of Gravity
What you need to know
JPMorgan loses its map on Iran war oil pricing
JPMorgan's Global Commodities Research team says it can no longer build a credible baseline for how the Iran conflict ends, marking a break from six months of forecasting built on assumed economic red lines. The bank's 17 September "Dry Powder" note admits the thresholds it expected to force a settlement, like $100 oil or 5% gas prices, have been breached without producing one.
Brent has stayed above $100 a barrel and closed at $104.82 on 17 September.
U.S. gasoline sat near $4.37 a gallon and diesel hit a seasonally adjusted record of $6.31 a gallon when the report was prepared.
The 10-year Treasury yield and 4% inflation thresholds have also been approached without forcing a resolution.
Inventories hold up far better than feared
JPMorgan's April modeling warned global stocks could hit operationally critical levels by June or July. That has not happened. The bank now estimates inventories fell by about 555 million barrels since the war began, roughly one-third of its original projection.
Global oil demand fell about 4.4 million barrels per day year-on-year, cushioning the drawdown.
JPMorgan pegs September fair value for Brent near $90 a barrel, about $16 below the market price at the time.
Using its rule that 1 million barrels per day of disrupted supply adds roughly $4 to price, the bank reads that gap as the market pricing in risk of a further 4 million barrels per day of losses on top of about 10 million already disrupted, not an actual additional loss.
Risk widens beyond the Strait of Hormuz
The threat picture has spread well past the original Hormuz chokepoint. Houthi advances along Yemen's Red Sea coast and near the Bab el-Mandeb Strait now threaten a second major shipping route.
Attacks on Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline, built specifically to bypass Hormuz, show that backup infrastructure is also exposed.
Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries add a separate pressure point outside the Gulf entirely.
Aggregate cushion masks a diesel crunch
Global crude and product stocks overall have proven resilient, but that masks acute tightness in specific products. Diesel is already extremely tight even as the broader system absorbs the shock.
The imbalance means the market is buffered against a broad disorderly shortage but increasingly exposed to localized breakdowns and infrastructure failures.
The real constraint is political, not physical
JPMorgan's core question has flipped. In April, the worry was the world running short of oil before the war ended. Now, with inventories proving durable, the harder problem is that neither high prices nor physical scarcity are forcing a political resolution.
The bank sees limited need for crude to move sharply higher near-term given the stock buffer.
The main risk is a conflict long or wide enough to burn through that "dry powder," at which point the pricing calculus could shift fast.
Known Unknowns: The impact of U.S. tariffs on international trade & especially the U.S. bond market. Whether protagonists in the U.S./Israel war on Iran will return to genuine peace negotiations, and the military capabilities & staying power of both sides. What impact the Iran war will have on the global economy. Relations of new Syrian government with Israel, international community, & ability to maintain & expand stability and control inside Syria. China’s triggers for military action against Taiwan. U.S. and allied responses to China’s ‘grey zone’ warfare in the South China Sea and north Asia. Ukraine’s ability to withstand Russia’s war of attrition. The potential for the jihadist insurgency in Africa’s Sahel region to consolidate and spread.
The Middle East
Birthplace of civilization
Trump weighs return to full-scale strikes on Iran
President Donald Trump says he faces a major decision on whether to resume large-scale U.S. attacks on Iran, a shift that could end weeks of lower-intensity warfare focused on sanctions, naval blockade, and limited strikes. Trump told Axios Thursday, "I have a big decision coming up," explicitly raising renewed attacks on Tehran.
Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have ordered U.S. forces in the Middle East to hold at current elevated levels through year-end.
This keeps Washington positioned to return rapidly to full-scale combat if ordered.
Gulf consultations precede the decision
Trump is set to meet leaders or senior representatives from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Oman on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York next week, with the Iran war expected to dominate talks. Axios reports Trump wants Gulf input before choosing between intensified strikes and another diplomatic push.
Trump previously shelved a return to major combat in early August after Saudi Arabia and Qatar warned Iran could hit Gulf oil and gas infrastructure in retaliation.
Washington opted instead for heavier sanctions, a maintained naval blockade, and operations concentrated on the Strait of Hormuz.
Reporting doubles as signaling
The Axios account draws heavily on Trump's own comments and unnamed U.S. officials, functioning as much as a message to Tehran and Gulf partners as a forecast. No final decision to resume the broader bombing campaign has been confirmed.
Tehran readies for the same scenario
Iran's leadership is not treating the current lower-intensity phase as stable. A senior Iranian official told Bloomberg on September 9 that Iran is prepared to escalate counterstrikes if U.S. attacks on Iranian territory continue.
The official said Iran has rebuilt military capacity since the war's earlier intensive phase and holds sufficient missile stocks for a prolonged fight.
Iranian leaders reportedly view the conflict as existential and believe they cannot stand down until Washington grows wary of further strikes.
Iranian officials have threatened U.S. warships, bases, and regional energy sites, framing control of maritime traffic as a tool to break the U.S. blockade rather than pure retaliation.
Gulf states carry the immediate exposure
Both Washington and Tehran now appear to be planning around the same contingency, that the current lull gives way to a larger exchange. Gulf states hosting U.S. forces would absorb much of the initial fallout from any renewed strikes.
Iran has shown willingness to hit U.S. facilities and host nations directly.
Gulf governments remain focused on protecting oil, gas, and desalination infrastructure from retaliatory attack.
The obvious implication is that large-scale military options are back at the center of White House deliberations, not that they have been ordered.
Trump's Gulf consultations next week will likely determine which path he takes.
____________________
Iran mobilizes civilians into 1,000 resistance battalions
Iran has launched a mass civilian mobilization campaign, aiming to organize volunteers into 1,000 "National Resistance Battalions" starting in Tehran before expanding nationwide. The drive, run under the "Janfada-ye Iran" ("Those Who Sacrifice for Iran") banner, is closely tied to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and its Basij volunteer force.
Registration opened September 15 through mosques, Basij bases, public gatherings, and an online system.
Organizers claim the initial 1,000 battalions filled within 100 minutes, a figure not independently verified.
Tehran claims mass turnout, numbers unverified
The campaign peaked September 18 with a large military-style mobilization event in Tehran. Greater Tehran IRGC commander Brigadier General Hassan Hassanzadeh said over 600,000 people had registered, with more than 1 million expected to eventually receive training.
Iranian state television put Friday's turnout above 300,000, while the Basij had pre-advertised the event at 313,000 participants.
Participants span students, workers, athletes, and women alongside Basij and IRGC members.
Training goes beyond basic defense
Authorities say volunteers will get military and civil-defense instruction, including assault rifle training and emergency wartime-response skills. Campaign materials also advertise more specialized instruction covering drones and other military equipment, pointing to ambitions beyond a simple civil-defense corps.
Basij commander Hossein Taeb says the volunteers will form an added layer of national defense, with similar mobilization events planned in other Iranian cities. That points to a deliberate effort to build a much larger trained manpower pool to backstop the IRGC and Basij in a prolonged conflict.
A defense structure expanding faster than it can be verified
The mobilization lands amid months of war with the U.S. and Israel, as Tehran braces for possible renewed large-scale strikes. It marks a significant expansion of the organized civilian layer of Iran's defense apparatus.
The actual strength, equipment, and command structure of the proposed 1,000 battalions remain unclear.
Iranian government claims on volunteer numbers have not been independently confirmed, leaving the real scale of the program, and its readiness, an open question heading into any next phase of the conflict.
____________________
U.S. clears F-35 sale to Saudi Arabia, breaking Israel's Mideast monopoly
The State Department has approved a potential $24.3 billion sale of F-35A stealth fighters to Saudi Arabia, the clearest break yet from Washington's decades-old policy of reserving its top-tier combat aircraft for Israel alone in the region. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress of the proposed deal on September 17.
The package covers 48 Lockheed Martin F-35s, 49 Pratt & Whitney F135 engines, communications gear, spare parts, training, and logistical support.
If completed, Saudi Arabia becomes the first Arab country to operate the F-35 and only the second Middle Eastern state after Israel to field a fifth-generation stealth jet.
Congress, and years of lead time, stand between approval and delivery
The notification is not a finalized sale. It still faces congressional review, and even if approved, deliveries would stretch out over several years.
Washington bends its Israel edge doctrine, insists balance holds
The State Department says the sale would sharpen Saudi Arabia's deterrence, boost its air-to-air and air-to-ground capability, and improve interoperability with U.S. forces, while insisting it would not shift the regional military balance. That claim will draw scrutiny given Washington's statutory obligation to preserve Israel's qualitative military edge, which the F-35's exclusivity has underpinned until now.
Timing ties the deal to active Gulf threats
The approval lands as Saudi Arabia faces renewed Houthi missile and drone attacks, and follows Trump's November 2025 announcement that Washington would allow Riyadh to acquire the jet. The package reinforces the U.S.-Saudi security relationship at a moment of elevated conflict risk across the Gulf and Red Sea, including the broader Iran standoff and Houthi threats to shipping lanes detailed in JPMorgan's latest oil market assessment.
Congressional review timing and any conditions attached will determine how quickly, and how completely, the deal moves from notification to delivery.
____________________
Russia and China veto extension of UN Iran sanctions monitoring
Russia and China vetoed a U.S.-backed Security Council resolution that would have extended the UN's Iran sanctions monitoring panel for another year, eliminating a key independent scrutiny mechanism just as Washington weighs renewed military escalation. The vote drew 11 in favor, with Russia and China opposed and Pakistan and Somalia abstaining, but failed under the two permanent members' veto.
Panel's mandate lapses within days
The Panel of Experts, set up under Resolution 1929, investigates sanctions violations and tracks Iranian procurement, arms transfers, financial activity, and other evasion methods, reporting findings back to the Security Council. Its mandate expires September 26, and no successor mechanism has been agreed.
Loss of the panel would significantly cut independent UN scrutiny of sanctions implementation and alleged violations.
France has floated exploring alternative arrangements, though nothing concrete has been proposed.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will continue monitoring Iran's nuclear program separately, under its own safeguards mandate, leaving broader sanctions evasion largely unwatched.
Veto exposes a deeper political fracture
The veto is not a procedural dispute but a rejection of the sanctions' underlying legitimacy. Russia and China argue the JCPOA "snapback" mechanism used to restore earlier UN sanctions lacked legal validity, while the U.S. and European powers maintain the restoration was valid after Iran failed to meet its nuclear commitments.
That disagreement removes one more layer of multilateral oversight just as the conflict's military and economic tracks intensify, from Trump's weighing of renewed large-scale strikes to Iran's civilian mobilization drive and JPMorgan's warning that it can no longer model the war's endgame. With UN monitoring lapsing and Gulf leaders set to meet Trump in New York next week, sanctions enforcement against Iran will increasingly depend on unilateral U.S. and allied action rather than independent UN reporting.
Cold War 2.0
It’s the U.S. vs China, everyone needs to pick a side
Russia hits Ukraine's infrastructure and a civilian vessel in one barrage
Russia launched another large-scale missile and drone attack across Ukraine on September 17, striking Kyiv and at least seven other regions and injuring more than 20 people. The barrage damaged energy, telecommunications, and industrial infrastructure, with additional strikes reported around Odesa and Zaporizhzhia.
Roughly 20 people were wounded in Kyiv alone.
A Russian drone struck a Tanzanian-flagged civilian vessel sailing toward a Ukrainian port in the Black Sea, killing the captain and injuring three crew members, per Ukraine's Infrastructure Ministry.
Poland scrambles jets as strikes near NATO airspace
The attack's proximity to NATO territory prompted Poland to scramble fighter aircraft and temporarily close the airports at Rzeszów and Lublin as a precaution. Polish authorities reported no actual airspace violation, but the response marks another instance of Russian strikes forcing NATO members into defensive posture.
Ukraine escalates its own refinery campaign
Ukraine expanded its long-range strike campaign inside Russia in parallel, hitting the Slavneft-YANOS oil refinery at Yaroslavl, about 250 kilometers (155 miles) northeast of Moscow. Drones damaged a major crude-distillation unit and forced the facility, a 300,000-barrel-per-day refinery and one of Russia's largest, to halt crude processing entirely.
Ukraine also reported strikes on a military airfield in Russia's Rostov region.
Refinery strikes add to a system already under strain
Ukraine's refinery campaign compounds pressure JPMorgan has already flagged as a source of tightness in refined products, with the bank citing Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries as a factor pushing diesel toward record prices even as overall crude inventories hold up. Continued strikes on facilities like Yaroslavl risk further squeezing product markets regardless of how the broader Iran conflict develops.
____________________
Germany braces its hospitals for a NATO war footing
Germany is preparing its hospital system for a possible major NATO conflict, with military planners modeling up to 1,000 wounded or sick German and allied personnel arriving daily. The Bundeswehr's five military hospitals would fill quickly under that scenario, pushing most of the wartime casualty load onto civilian hospitals.
Germany has started training civilian surgeons to treat battlefield injuries and mass-casualty cases.
Military exercises are testing evacuation routes and how wounded personnel would be distributed across the civilian health system.
Planning treats Germany as NATO's rear-area hospital
The scale of preparation reflects growing expectation that Germany would function as a major medical and logistics hub in any conflict on NATO's eastern flank, not a peripheral participant. That reframes Berlin's role from political and financial backer to a frontline logistics node for the alliance.
Cold War bunkers come back into the planning
The Bundeswehr is weighing whether to reactivate Cold War-era medical infrastructure, including an underground hospital beneath its Ulm facility. Completed in 1979, the bunker was built to keep functioning after a nuclear attack and could house up to 2,000 people for as long as 90 days, though it is not currently operational.
Supply chains get a resilience push
Berlin is separately working to cut dependence on foreign medical supply chains, including Chinese-produced pharmaceutical ingredients, as part of a wider wartime resilience effort. That mirrors the broader pattern across the Iran and Ukraine conflicts, where states are treating inventory buffers, whether oil stocks or medical supplies, as strategic assets that determine how long a prolonged confrontation can be sustained before real shortages force policy change.
____________________
UK tells households to stock up as it retools for wartime contingencies
The UK government is urging households to prepare for severe disruption, part of a broader push to strengthen national emergency and conflict planning. Official guidance now encourages stockpiling drinking water, tinned or ready-to-eat food, and other essentials, with ministers preparing a wider public campaign on national resilience.
Home defense planning folds civilians into military response
The household guidance sits inside a wider Home Defence Programme designed to integrate civilian and military planning during a crisis or period of international hostilities affecting Britain. The government is updating classified departmental contingency plans known as "War Books," a mechanism last overhauled at this scale during the Cold War.
A major national home-defense exercise is scheduled for 2027 to test responses to attacks and disruption on the UK mainland.
Officials frame it as all-hazards, not a war warning
The government says the household guidance covers a broad range of emergencies, including extreme weather, cyberattacks, and infrastructure failures, not a specific signal that war is imminent. Britain's National Security Strategy, however, explicitly states the country must prepare for the possibility of the homeland coming under direct threat in a wartime scenario, a formal acknowledgment that goes further than the public messaging suggests.
Britain joins a broader resilience buildout
The UK move lands alongside Germany's parallel push to ready its hospital system and medical supply chains for a NATO conflict, pointing to a wider allied shift toward treating civilian infrastructure, not just military assets, as a wartime resource that needs active preparation. How closely London and Berlin coordinate these efforts, and whether other NATO members follow with similar public campaigns, will be a marker of how seriously the alliance rates the risk of direct conflict reaching member territory.
____________________
U.S. and Poland advance permanent U.S. base plans
President Donald Trump says Washington and Warsaw have made "major progress" toward establishing a permanent U.S. Army base in Poland, a step that would formalize what has so far been a rotational American troop presence on NATO's eastern flank.
Timing lines up with Tusk's own threat warnings
The progress comes as Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk travels to Kyiv, having recently warned NATO allies of the risk that Russian drones or missiles could hit European states supporting Ukraine.
That warning followed Poland's own scramble of fighter jets and temporary closure of the Rzeszów and Lublin airports on September 17, when a Russian strike on Ukraine came close to NATO airspace.
A permanent base would mark a durable shift in posture
A permanent installation, rather than rotational deployments, would lock in a longer-term American military footprint in Poland regardless of shifts in the war's trajectory. Given Tusk's warnings and the near-miss airspace incident, the base talks read less as routine alliance management and more as a direct response to Poland's assessment that it faces elevated risk from Russian escalation, one more data point in the wider pattern of NATO members hardening their postures, alongside Germany's hospital preparations and the UK's household resilience campaign.
Sign up link: https://www.center-of-gravity.info
Inside Track: https://www.center-of-gravity.info/upgrade
What happened today:
96 - Emperor Domitian assassinated; Nerva proclaimed Roman emperor. 324 - Constantine defeats Licinius at the Battle of Chrysopolis, becoming sole ruler of the Roman Empire. 1759 - Quebec capitulates to Britain during the Seven Years’ War. 1914 - Irish Home Rule Act receives Royal Assent. 1931 - Mukden Incident provides the pretext for Japan’s invasion of Manchuria. 1934 - Soviet Union admitted to the League of Nations. 1947 - National Security Act takes effect, establishing the CIA and the U.S. Air Force. 1961 - UN Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjöld dies in a plane crash during a Congo peace mission. 1973 - East Germany and West Germany admitted to the United Nations. 1988 - Myanmar military seizes power and establishes the State Law and Order Restoration Council. 1997 - Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention concluded in Oslo. 2014 - Scottish independence referendum held.
