What you need to know

War enters bargaining phase as U.S. builds forces and Hormuz disruption spreads

The war is starting to look less like a straightforward climb up the escalation ladder and more like a phase of coercive bargaining conducted under continuing fire.

Washington is still expanding its military posture. USS Tripoli is at Diego Garcia, with elements of the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit moving toward the Middle East, and U.S. operations against Iran-aligned targets have continued even after President Donald Trump said on 23 March that he would postpone threatened strikes on Iranian power and energy sites for five days. Trump presented the delay as the result of contacts with Tehran; Iran has publicly denied that any negotiations are under way. But reports point to Türkiye, Pakistan, and Egypt acting as intermediaries with Iran.

That leaves the current moment looking less like de-escalation than bargaining under pressure. The reported U.S. pause appears to apply only to Iranian energy infrastructure, not to the wider military campaign, which suggests Washington is trying to preserve coercive leverage while testing whether diplomacy can still extract concessions. Tehran, for its part, appears determined to deny that talks exist even as indirect channels remain active.

Meanwhile, the conflict is continuing to spread across the region. Fresh strikes in Iraq and an intensifying Israeli campaign in south Lebanon (while Iranian missiles hit Tel Aviv) show that the wider war is still broadening even as messages pass behind the scenes.

And although the Strait of Hormuz is not fully sealed, it remains tightly constricted: around 20,000 seafarers and some 3,200 vessels are still stranded west of the waterway, even as a small number of ships have managed selective crossings.

The economic consequences are now spreading far beyond crude prices alone. Brent fell to $99.94 a barrel and WTI to $88.13 after Trump’s pause was announced on 23 March, but slightly lower crude prices (note Brent was around $71 on 27 February, and WTI around $66) did little to ease the wider disruption.

Across Asia and beyond, governments and industries are already moving into emergency mode as tighter fuel and LNG supplies strain power systems, transport networks, and manufacturing. South Korea has introduced energy-saving measures, Japan is preparing a record oil release, and Australia is grappling with visible fuel shortages.

The next phase of the war may therefore be shaped less by a single battlefield breakthrough than by whether selective coercion in Hormuz hardens into a longer economic siege.

It is still not clear whether Iran’s allies, the Houthis, will close the Bab al-Mandab, which will block Saudi pipeline oil from reaching Asia, and also block the Suez Canal. The consequences of closing the Bab al-Mandab will make the current growing global economic crisis look mild.

The ultimate complex system

China’s plastics output comes under pressure

China’s plastics industry is coming under mounting strain as higher feedstock costs and shipping disruption through the Strait of Hormuz squeeze production of basic petrochemicals, especially ethylene and PVC. Industry reports suggest that downstream producers of ethylene-based PVC have begun cutting output in an effort to contain costs and limit exposure to volatile raw-material markets, while tighter supply is pushing prices higher across parts of the chain.

The pressure is no longer merely prospective. A Shell-CNOOC joint venture has shut an ethylene cracker in Huizhou and had previously told customers that polyethylene shipments would be suspended indefinitely from 5 March. Elsewhere in Asia, supply tightness is continuing to weigh on petrochemicals as conflict in the Middle East disrupts feedstock availability and freight. Taken together, these developments suggest that China’s plastics sector is moving from margin pressure to genuine production restraint.

PVC is being caught in the same squeeze. Downstream ethylene-based PVC producers have been cutting operating rates as ethylene prices rise, while Chinese PVC sellers have become more aggressive on pricing as availability tightens. That matters because PVC and ethylene sit near the base of a much broader manufacturing chain, feeding everything from construction materials and packaging to consumer goods and industrial components.

The broad implication is that China’s chemical system is no longer contending only with weak demand or oversupply, the problems that dominated much of the past year. It is now facing disrupted energy-linked inputs, higher freight costs, and growing uncertainty over whether raw materials can move reliably into Asia. If those constraints persist, the effect is likely to spread beyond petrochemicals into downstream manufacturing, exports, and regional supply chains.

Singapore bunker suppliers cut back as Asia’s fuel squeeze deepens

Shipping-fuel suppliers in Singapore are beginning to ration deliveries and retreat from normal contract sales as the regional fuel market tightens under the strain of disruption in the Middle East. The strongest reporting to date suggests that some suppliers are filling only part of agreed bunker orders, while others have moved away from term business and toward spot sales as prices have climbed.

On 11 March bunker prices in Singapore, the world’s largest marine-fuel hub, were reported to have more than doubled for key grades since 28 February, with the main low-sulfur fuel rising above $1,000 a metric ton (1.102 U.S. tons) and some vessels struggling to secure prompt refueling slots.

What has been documented is a severe tightening, rationing in some cases, and a market increasingly driven by costly spot offers rather than stable contract deliveries. Singapore’s Maritime and Port Authority also rejected the more alarmist interpretation, saying on 13 March that the port still had adequate marine-fuel supply and had seen no significant change in vessel arrivals. This is not a full shutdown of Singapore’s bunkering system. It is, however, a clear sign of strain in one of the world’s most important shipping hubs.

The pressure is coming from several directions at once. Fuel-oil flows from the Middle East have been disrupted, Asian and Gulf refiners have cut runs, and China has imposed a temporary ban on exports of diesel, gasoline, and jet fuel through at least the end of March in order to protect its domestic market. At the same time, record Russian fuel-oil volumes are heading into Asia, much of them bound for Singapore and Malaysia, which may provide some relief. Even so, the broader market is expected to remain tight in the coming weeks. The result is a bunker market that is still operating, but under growing pressure, with higher prices, more selective supply, and greater uncertainty for shipowners calling at Singapore.

Thailand’s Gulf LNG dependence raises power crisis risk

Thailand is facing a growing risk to its power system because of its heavy dependence on natural gas and LNG imports from the Persian Gulf.

More than 60% of the country’s electricity is generated from natural gas, leaving it highly exposed to any disruption in supply or sharp rise in prices. Thailand’s LNG imports have risen sevenfold since 2014, deepening that dependence.

The financial impact is also significant: each 10% increase in gas prices translates into an estimated 3.5% rise in electricity tariffs. With spot LNG prices now running at roughly twice last year’s average, any sustained shock in Gulf supply will quickly become a national energy emergency for Thailand.

Gasoline prices surge worldwide, with Europe bearing the brunt

Gasoline prices are climbing sharply around the world, with Europe remaining the most expensive major consumer market and the Netherlands among the hardest-hit countries. Dutch Euro 95 gasoline averaged €2.262 a liter on 16 March, the highest national average in the European Union, compared with an EU-wide average of €1.711.

The wider European picture is similarly severe. Prices across much of northwestern Europe remain far above those in most other advanced economies, reflecting high taxes, refining constraints, and the broader energy shock now rippling through global fuel markets. Europe’s elevated prices are also being reinforced by an unusual trade shift: gasoline cargoes from Europe are now being redirected to Asia as suppliers chase higher margins there.

The United States remains cheaper than Europe, but the rise there has also been steep. AAA’s national average reached $3.956 a gallon on 23 March, with several states already well above $4 and some above $5. Analysts now expect further upward pressure as crude prices rise and supply fears tied to the Middle East conflict continue to feed through to retail markets.

In Asia, governments are beginning to intervene more directly. China announced on 23 March that it would limit the increase in retail fuel prices, cushioning consumers from the full impact of surging crude.

The current fuel shock is no longer a local spike but a worldwide inflationary pressure affecting transport, household budgets, and industrial supply chains.

EU and Australia seal long-delayed free-trade pact

The European Union and Australia have concluded a long-delayed free-trade agreement, reviving negotiations that collapsed in 2023 over access for red meat and the use of European product names such as prosecco.

The deal was announced in Canberra on Tuesday by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese after eight years of talks, and it was paired with a broader EU-Australia security and defense partnership.

The agreement is economically substantial. Australia says 97.8% of its goods exports will enter the EU duty-free once the pact takes effect, while the European Commission says nearly all EU goods exports to Australia will become duty-free, with European firms expected to save more than €1 billion ($1.16 billion) a year in tariffs. The package opens or expands market access for Australian beef, sheep meat, sugar, wine, seafood, rice, and dairy, while also making it easier for EU firms to sell services in Australia and deepening ties in areas such as investment and raw materials. A politically sensitive compromise was also struck over geographical indications: some existing Australian producers will keep certain names, but Australian prosecco exports will lose that label after a ten-year transition.

The pact is about more than trade. Both sides have presented it as part of a wider effort to diversify commercial and strategic ties at a time of growing concern over supply-chain vulnerability, dependence on China, and volatile U.S. trade policy.

The accord is not yet in force. Australia says both sides must now complete domestic procedures, signature, and ratification, a process that could take up to two years. And although Canberra is presenting the outcome as a strategic and commercial success, some Australian farm groups have already complained that the final quotas, especially on red meat, are too modest for a deal of this scale. In other words, the agreement is a breakthrough, but not an unqualified one.

It’s now the U.S. vs China, everyone needs to pick a side

China and the Philippines face new standoff at Scarborough Shoal

A fresh confrontation has broken out near Scarborough Shoal after the Philippine Coast Guard and the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources dispatched two coast guard vessels and five fishery patrol boats to protect more than 20 Filipino fishing boats that Manila says were being harassed by Chinese Coast Guard ships inside the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone.

Philippine officials said a maritime domain awareness flight over the area recorded six China Coast Guard vessels, 20 China Maritime Militia vessels, and one People’s Liberation Army Navy warship operating around the shoal.

The immediate trigger appears to have been what Philippine officials described as a new Chinese “clearing operation” around Bajo de Masinloc, the Philippine name for the shoal. Philippine Coast Guard spokesman Jay Tarriela said the broadcasts were intended to intimidate fishermen and entrench tighter Chinese control over access to the area.

That makes this more than another routine maritime encounter. The combination of coast guard ships, maritime militia, and a PLA Navy warship points to a layered show of force designed to pressure civilian fishermen while backing law-enforcement claims with military weight. In practical terms, it suggests that Beijing is continuing to rely on “gray-zone” tactics: coercive actions that stop short of open naval combat but steadily raise the cost of a Philippine presence at the shoal. This fits a broader pattern of Chinese patrols and warnings near Scarborough. In February, China’s Southern Theater Command said it had carried out routine South China Sea patrols and accused the Philippines of disrupting regional stability.

Scarborough remains one of the most combustible flashpoints in the South China Sea because it combines symbolism, fishing rights, and legal dispute in a relatively small space. China seized effective control of the shoal after the 2012 standoff, but a 2016 arbitral ruling found that Beijing’s sweeping “nine-dash line” claim had no legal basis under the law of the sea and also held that traditional fishing rights at Scarborough Shoal had to be respected. China rejected that ruling. The result is a standoff in which Beijing exercises de facto control while Manila keeps trying to prevent that control from becoming politically or operationally permanent.

The near-term risk is not necessarily a formal naval clash, but another cycle of ramming, blocking, water-cannon attacks, or the exclusion of fishermen that gradually hardens into a new status quo. Scarborough has already seen repeated confrontations, including a collision last year involving Chinese coast guard and navy vessels during an attempt to block a Philippine mission. This latest deployment suggests that neither side is willing to yield the water, and that Scarborough will remain a live test of how far China can push maritime coercion without provoking a broader regional response.

Move fast and break things

Senate deadlock leaves TSA unpaid and airport lines growing

Another Senate failure to advance Department of Homeland Security funding has left the Transportation Security Administration caught in the middle of a political impasse, with thousands of airport screeners still working without pay and delays worsening at major U.S. hubs. A Homeland Security funding bill failed again in the Senate over the weekend as Democrats pushed to separate TSA funding from the broader dispute over Immigration and Customs Enforcement. By Tuesday, lawmakers were still trying to assemble a narrower compromise.

The practical effects are now visible at airports. TSA officers have gone unpaid since the funding lapse began in mid-February, and staffing gaps have become serious enough to push some airports into crisis mode. Houston’s George Bush Intercontinental warned on Monday that wait times could exceed four hours, while Atlanta and other major airports have also reported unusually long lines. More than 100 airport leaders have urged Congress to end the deadlock, warning that the consequences for operations and passenger experience are becoming more severe by the day.

The administration has tried to limit the fallout by sending ICE agents to assist at more than a dozen airports, largely in crowd management and exit-lane duties rather than screening itself. But that is a temporary fix, not a solution. ICE officers cannot replace trained TSA screeners, and the deeper problem is political: Congress still has not agreed on whether DHS funding can move without changes to immigration enforcement. Until that question is resolved, airport disruption is likely to remain one of the clearest signs of Washington’s dysfunction.

Center of Gravity sign up link: https://www.namea-group.com/the-daily-brief