In partnership with
What if ChatGPT recommends your competitor first?
Over 2,500 businesses already show up in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google. AutoSEO writes expert articles and earns backlinks while they sleep. No SEO learning curve. No agency. Set it up once and let it run.
- The United States and Iran have again entered an undeclared and fragile pause after 13 nights of U.S. strikes, creating limited space for mediation but no formal ceasefire. - The blockade of the Strait of Hormuz remains, shipping is far below normal levels, and both sides retain the capacity to resume attacks. U.S. commanders reportedly believe roughly 20 percent of identified Iranian military targets remain untouched, while concerns are growing over interceptor use and diminishing returns. - Regional pressure is widening. Houthi forces struck or targeted Saudi oil facilities at Jazan and Yanbu, while reports of an attack on Abqaiq today remain unverified. - In Iraq, six drones were intercepted over Erbil, and federal forces withdrew from a disputed militia-linked compound near Baghdad without completing a search, underscoring limits on state authority. - Romania scrambled F-16s after a fourth consecutive airspace incursion linked to Russian attacks on Ukraine. - In Libya, power-cut protests spread across Tripoli and increasingly targeted Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibah’s government. - Israel approved a legal framework for an international stabilization force in Gaza, but implementation remains unclear. - Meanwhile, killings of Israelis, raids, settlement expansion, and settler attacks have intensified across the West Bank, especially around Nablus, raising the risk of a broader cycle of retaliation. |
Center of Gravity
What you need to know
Back to a pause in U.S. strikes on Iran
The U.S. and Iran have slid into an undeclared pause after 13 straight nights of American airstrikes, but neither side has agreed to a formal ceasefire. President Donald Trump is giving talks "a little bit of room," according to U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz, while Tehran says it will hold fire only as long as Washington does the same.
Iran is publicly distancing itself from the idea of new negotiations. Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said on July 27 that Tehran had not requested talks and that its position on Hormuz is unchanged, even as indirect contacts continue through regional mediators.
The lull may reflect target exhaustion, not restraint.
U.S. commanders have told officials that most prepared targets in southern Iran and around Hormuz are already struck, and that continuing at the same pace brings diminishing returns without a broader campaign.
Air-defense interceptor stocks and the strain of an extended regional war have also been raised as concerns, though the Pentagon hasn't confirmed this publicly.
Hormuz enforcement moves from navies to underwriters
The core dispute, control of the strait, is now being fought out in insurance contracts as much as in strikes. Washington wants unrestricted, toll-free transit; Tehran wants recognition of an Iranian role in managing traffic, and has been charging ad hoc transit fees of up to $2 million a voyage on some vessels.
The Lloyd's Market Association published a clause on July 23 that voids hull cover for any vessel confirmed to have paid Iran's transit fee, citing US, UK, and EU sanctions and terrorism exposure. Because Lloyd's wordings function as a global standard, this effectively closes the option shipowners had hoped for: paying Iran and staying insured. Owners are left choosing between paying and sailing uninsured, or refusing and absorbing the risk of attack.
Traffic reflects the squeeze.
Only seven vessels crossed Hormuz on Friday, three on Saturday, and seven on Sunday, versus more than 100 a day under normal conditions.
The U.S. Navy has redirected 12 commercial vessels, disabled two, and boarded two during the campaign.
Oman-mediated talks have floated a system giving Iran an oversight role over transit in exchange for eased restrictions, but nothing has been agreed.
Red Sea becomes the second chokepoint
Houthi forces have struck Saudi Aramco facilities at Yanbu and Jizan after threatening Saudi shipping, opening a second front just as Hormuz traffic dries up. Only 11 commodity vessels crossed the Bab el-Mandeb on Sunday, the lowest level in months.
Lloyd's of London insurers have told brokers they will exclude vessels with any Saudi "touchpoints," including foreign-flagged ships that previously called at Saudi ports, from Red Sea war-risk cargo cover. The move follows Houthi attacks on the Saudi-flagged tankers Encelia and Layla and threatens a route that has become more important to Saudi exports precisely because Hormuz is largely closed.
Two disrupted chokepoints mean a partial Hormuz reopening alone would not restore normal regional trade and energy flows.
Greek shipper's fleet absorbs the risk
Greek shipping magnate George Prokopiou, whose Dynacom Tankers has kept sending ships through Hormuz since the war began, has had two vessels hit in the past week.
Kavomaleas, a Malta-flagged product tanker, was struck by two projectiles on July 19 off Oman's Kumzar, caught fire, and was evacuated; satellite imagery later showed a vessel matching its profile inside Iranian waters near Larak Island, suggesting a seizure.
Acheloos, a 306,000-deadweight-tonne Liberian-flagged VLCC delivered earlier this year, was struck by a projectile around the same time while using the same U.S.-facilitated southern corridor near Oman.
What’s coming up next
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meets Trump in Washington on July 28 and is expected to push for continued pressure on Iran and firmer guarantees on its nuclear and missile programs, a meeting that could reset U.S. calculus on resuming strikes.
Admiral Brad Cooper, commander of U.S. Central Command, has told associates that roughly 20% of identified Iranian military targets remain untouched and has recommended that any renewed campaign hit those rather than infrastructure or Hormuz protection, according to Axios' Barak Ravid.
The most likely near-term path is continued armed pause: no ceasefire, a still-throttled Hormuz, and a insurance-driven de facto blockade that could unravel quickly if talks stall or either side resumes attacks.
_______________
Houthis widen the oil war, Abqaiq attack claim still unconfirmed
The Houthis have opened a broader campaign against Saudi Arabia's oil infrastructure, hitting Aramco facilities at Jazan and Yanbu on July 25 with ballistic missiles and drones. Unverified reports circulating on July 27 claim the group also struck Aramco's Abqaiq processing complex, but no Saudi authority, Aramco, or major international outlet has confirmed that claim.
The distinction matters operationally. Jazan and Yanbu are confirmed targets with visual evidence; Abqaiq is not, and the online material behind the claim hasn't been independently geolocated or dated, with some of it apparently recycled from the Jazan footage.
Jazan shows physical damage.
Verified footage shows a large column of black smoke rising from the refinery's direction, strong evidence part of the complex was hit or caught fire.
Aramco and Saudi authorities have released no damage assessment, casualty count, or confirmation of a production shutdown.
Initial indications point to storage tanks or auxiliary infrastructure rather than the refinery's main processing units.
Yanbu's defense holds, for now
Two ballistic missiles aimed at Yanbu were intercepted by a Greek-operated Patriot battery, a save with outsized importance given the port's role. Yanbu is Saudi Arabia's main Red Sea oil-export hub and the kingdom's primary way to move crude without transiting the Strait of Hormuz.
That makes Yanbu a higher-value target than a standard refinery hit: a successful strike there would compound, not just add to, the pressure already on Hormuz-linked exports.
Abqaiq claim needs treating with caution
Social media reports allege drones or missiles hit Abqaiq before dawn on July 27, describing multiple explosions and personnel evacuating the site. Saudi Aramco, the Saudi Press Agency, the Ministry of Defense, and Saudi Civil Defense have not confirmed any of this, and major international outlets continue to identify Jazan and Yanbu, not Abqaiq, as the operation's targets.
Abqaiq's importance is why any claim about it draws attention fast. It processes crude from several of the kingdom's largest fields and feeds the East-West Pipeline (also known as Petroline) that carries oil 1,201 km (746 miles) to Yanbu; Aramco has already pushed that line's throughput to roughly 7 million barrels a day by converting parallel natural gas liquids capacity to crude service, sacrificing NGL export revenue for raw volume. A confirmed hit on Abqaiq would threaten both domestic processing and the export route that's currently substituting for Hormuz.
Best current read
The evidence supports Jazan probably hit, Yanbu targeted but successfully defended, and Abqaiq possibly targeted in a separate, unconfirmed incident. There isn't yet enough to say Abqaiq sustained a successful strike or lost operational capacity.
What to watch: any Aramco or Saudi government statement on Abqaiq, and whether Yanbu's East-West Pipeline throughput holds, since a hit on either would remove the kingdom's main workaround for a largely closed Hormuz.
Known Unknowns: The impact of U.S. tariffs on international trade & especially the U.S. bond market. Whether protagonists in the U.S./Israel war on Iran will return to genuine peace negotiations, and the military capabilities & staying power of both sides. What impact this war will have on the global economy. Relations of new Syrian government with Israel, international community & ability to maintain stability inside Syria. China’s triggers for military action against Taiwan. U.S. and allied responses to China’s ‘grey zone’ warfare in the South China Sea and north Asia. Ukraine’s ability to withstand Russia’s war of attrition. The potential for the jihadist insurgency in Africa’s Sahel region to consolidate and spread.
The Middle East
Birthplace of civilization
Baghdad blinks
Iraq's Counter Terrorism Service, one of the country's most capable security institutions, surrounded a militia-linked compound southeast of Baghdad on July 24 and then withdrew without arrests, a search, or confiscated weapons after armed personnel inside blocked entry. That outcome matters more than the raid itself: it shows Baghdad's best forces can encircle a militia site but not enter one.
Ownership of the compound is disputed. Iraqi media identified it as a special-operations headquarters of Harakat Hezbollah al-Nujaba, one of Iraq's most influential Iran-aligned armed groups, which denies any raid took place and calls the reports provocation; other accounts point instead to Kataib Hezbollah.
The retreat exposes a capability-authority gap, not a capability gap.
Warning shots were fired, with no confirmed casualties.
Security sources say the site held equipment tied to drone manufacturing or assembly.
The same compound has reportedly been linked to past attacks on the U.S. Embassy and on facilities near Baghdad International Airport.
Erbil takes six drones in 24 hours
Kurdistan's Counter-Terrorism Directorate intercepted five explosive-laden drones over Erbil between 9:32 and 9:45 a.m. on July 24, launched from an area west of the city, and a sixth on July 25 around 3:30 p.m. that fell in an uninhabited area with no casualties or damage. Both waves came days after a prior attempted strike on July 22, making three attacks in a single week.
No group has claimed responsibility, and Iraqi authorities haven't named a launch team. The pattern, not any single strike, is the signal: interception has held so far, but militia factions retain reach to hit targets hundreds of kilometers (hundreds of miles) from their presumed bases.
Erbil has been a recurring target through the wider U.S.-Iran conflict, with U.S. facilities, Kurdish security sites, and regional infrastructure all hit before.
Why the timing lines up
The drone campaign against Erbil and the standoff at Jurf al-Nadaf happened in the same 72-hour window, both pointing to the same underlying fact: Iran-aligned militias are operating inside federal Iraq with enough freedom of action to strike a Kurdish capital and to face down Iraq's premier counterterrorism unit on the same weekend.
Neither incident required the militias to win a fight. Interception handled the drones, and simply blocking the door handled the raid. That's a lower bar for the groups to clear than actual combat, which is part of why it's replicable.
What Baghdad can't yet answer
The government faces a genuine bind: pushing federal forces into militia strongholds risks armed clashes with the same Popular Mobilization Forces that are formally part of Iraq's security structure, while backing off cedes the point that parts of the country sit outside effective federal oversight. Friday's withdrawal suggests Baghdad has, for now, chosen not to force the issue.
Watch for whether the Counter Terrorism Service attempts a follow-up search or whether the file quietly closes, since either outcome will tell international and regional powers more about Baghdad's actual authority than the original raid did.
_______________
Tripoli's power cuts become a Libyan political crisis
Protests over electricity cuts and failing public services spread across four Tripoli districts on July 26, Janzour, Tajoura, Souq al-Jumaa, and Ain Zara, with demonstrators blocking roads including sections of the coastal highway. The scale is the shift: this moved in a single day from scattered local grievance to a multi-district mobilization with organized follow-through plans.
Youth groups have announced a civil-disobedience campaign and threatened to shut down government offices, telecom companies, and Central Bank branches, escalation that would move beyond street blockages into deliberate disruption of state functions.
No deaths, armed clashes, or militia confrontations have been reported so far, keeping this a civil unrest story rather than a security one, for now.
Threat to Mellitah raises the economic stakes
Groups west of Tripoli have threatened action against the Mellitah oil and gas complex, a facility whose disruption would move the story from local service failures into national energy output, a different order of consequence than blocked roads.
No attack or shutdown at Mellitah has been reported yet, so this remains a threat rather than a realized disruption, but it's the detail that would most affect Libya's export revenue if acted on.
Demands widen to target Dbeibah directly
Some protesters have broadened their calls beyond electricity and services to demand the removal of Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibah's Government of National Unity. That reframes the unrest: a service-delivery complaint is now, for part of the protest movement, a direct challenge to the government's legitimacy.
This is the detail worth tracking closest. Infrastructure protests that stay focused on utilities tend to get managed with technical fixes or promises; protests that name the head of government and call for his removal carry a different trajectory and are harder to defuse with service restoration alone.
_______________
Gaza gets a force (in theory), not a settlement
Israel has approved the legal framework for an international stabilization force tied to President Donald Trump's Gaza peace initiative, the most concrete step for the Board of Peace plan in months. The initial deployment, roughly 200 personnel reportedly including Ugandan and Moroccan contingents, is small enough to function as a liaison or pilot mission rather than a force capable of policing Gaza or confronting Hamas.
The force would operate outside direct Israeli military control but only with countries Israel approves, and no deployment date has been set. Its immediate job is supporting a proposed humanitarian and governance zone around Rafah, not the broader reconstruction plan, which remains stalled: the Palestinian technocratic committee hasn't entered Gaza, and Hamas says it will hand over administration but won't disarm.
The plan and the ground reality point in opposite directions.
Israel controls an estimated 64% of Gaza and has said it intends to expand that footprint.
The Board of Peace framework envisions eventual Israeli withdrawal and unified Palestinian administration, the reverse of the current trajectory.
Israel has built more than 23 km (14 miles) of earthen barriers along the Yellow Line separating Israeli-controlled areas from the coastal population center, infrastructure Israel calls temporary but that could harden into a lasting partition.
Ceasefire in name, not in casualties
Military operations have continued despite the ceasefire. An Israeli strike in Deir al-Balah on July 26 killed Colonel Wael El-Ledawi, head of Hamas's internal security service in central Gaza, and Major Ramez Abu Zraiq, whom Israel called a Hamas operative. Hamas described both as police officials.
The casualty gap is the more telling number. Gaza health authorities report more than 1,190 Palestinians killed in Israeli attacks since the ceasefire began, against four Israeli soldiers killed by Palestinian militants in the same period, a ratio that shows the ceasefire has changed the form of the conflict without stopping the fighting.
Nablus violence creates a second front
A confrontation near the village of Tal, southwest of Nablus, on July 24 killed four Palestinians and two Israelis described as soldiers or reservists. The two sides dispute the sequence: Israel initially said Israeli civilians hiking in Area A were attacked and a Palestinian seized a weapon and opened fire, while Palestinian officials said 25 to 30 armed settlers approached the village, tried to enter homes, and opened fire after residents confronted them. Israel later acknowledged some of its citizens were armed and that both sides exchanged fire.
Israel's response has been broad: roadblocks around Nablus, canceled military leave, about 80 residents questioned and 11 arrested in Tal, and dozens more detained elsewhere in the West Bank. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also ordered preparations to demolish the family home of one Palestinian involved and said settlement construction nearby would accelerate, steps that escalate rather than contain the incident.
Settler attacks followed within two days.
Suspected settlers set fire to mosques in Qusra and Kour on July 26, with Hebrew graffiti at the sites referencing revenge for one of the Israelis killed near Tal.
Near Qalqilya, two Palestinians were injured and vehicles, trees, and other property were burned.
Reporting indicates settlers targeted at least five communities in the wider Nablus area after the Tal deaths.
The West Bank's numbers were already moving before Tal
The Tal incident landed on top of an existing surge, not a quiet baseline. The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs had recorded more than 1,260 settler-related incidents across 250 Palestinian communities by mid-July 2026, injuring around 850 Palestinians, more than half of all Palestinian injuries in the West Bank this year.
Separate stabbing incidents on July 23 add to the volatility: at Beit Furik, Palestinian sources said soldiers and settlers confronted residents fighting a fire before two Palestinians stabbed and wounded an Israeli and were shot dead by an armed civilian; elsewhere the same day, Israel said a Palestinian stabbed a soldier before being shot dead. Both accounts remain contested.
What to watch
Netanyahu meets Trump on July 28, with the Gaza international force, the Rafah zone, Israeli security controls, and Hamas's refusal to disarm all likely on the agenda, the same meeting flagged in relation to Iran. The real risk sits in the West Bank: Nablus has become the center of a cycle where military raids, settler attacks, and Palestinian responses each reinforce the next, and the same conditions, active settlement expansion, organized settler violence, and heavy security operations, could pull in northern and central areas beyond Nablus if the cycle isn't broken.
Cold War 2.0
It’s the U.S. vs China, everyone needs to pick a side
Fourth day, fourth Russian incursion into Romanian (= NATO) territory
Romania scrambled two F-16s on July 27 after an unidentified object briefly crossed into its airspace east of the Black Sea port of Sulina before reversing back toward Ukraine. That makes four consecutive days of Romanian airspace violations tied to intensified Russian strikes on southern Ukraine, up from a pattern of occasional incidents to a daily occurrence.
The shift that matters isn't the object itself, still unconfirmed in origin and type, but the frequency. Three straight days of shootdowns followed by a fourth incursion means Romania's air defense posture has moved from reactive alerts to a standing daily scramble routine on a NATO external border.
Timeline moved fast.
Radar detected the target the morning of July 27; Romania issued an RO-Alert to Tulcea County residents at 8:47 a.m.; two F-16s from the Romanian Air Force's 86th Air Base were airborne by 8:53 a.m., a six-minute response window.
The object crossed into Romanian airspace, then reversed course toward Ukraine; explosions were reported on Ukrainian territory afterward.
No interception occurred this time, unlike the prior three days.
Three days of shootdowns set the baseline
Romanian F-16s shot down drones entering national airspace on each of the three days before July 27, with at least one confirmed as a Russian-made Shahed-type drone and the others still under investigation. Romania summoned the Russian ambassador over the repeated violations, a diplomatic step that hasn't stopped the pattern from continuing into a fourth day.
The mix of confirmed and unconfirmed drone types matters for attribution, since a pattern of Shahed incursions reads as spillover from strikes on Ukrainian Danube ports, not a deliberate test of NATO airspace, but repetition narrows that distinction.
Where the pressure sits
The incursions cluster along Romania's Black Sea coast and the Danube frontier, the same corridor where Russia has been hitting Ukrainian port infrastructure. Geography, not intent, explains the concentration: drones and debris from strikes on nearby Ukrainian targets are the likely source, but that doesn't reduce the exposure for Romanian territory underneath.
Sign up link: https://www.center-of-gravity.info
Inside Track: https://www.center-of-gravity.info/upgrade
What is an EOR—and why are companies using it?
Opening entities in every country can be slow, expensive, and hard to scale.
That's why more companies are using EOR to hire globally faster.
See how Oyster helps teams hire, pay, and support talent in 180+ countries while staying compliant along the way.
What happened today:
1694 - The Bank of England receives its royal charter. 1789 - The U.S. Department of Foreign Affairs, predecessor of the Department of State, is established. 1794 - Maximilien Robespierre is arrested during the Thermidorian Reaction in France. 1866 - The first permanent transatlantic telegraph cable is completed. 1880 - Afghan forces defeat the British at the Battle of Maiwand. 1929 - The Geneva Convention governing the treatment of prisoners of war is signed. 1953 - The Korean Armistice Agreement ends major hostilities in the Korean War. 1955 - The Austrian State Treaty enters into force, restoring Austrian sovereignty. 1964 - The U.S. sends another 5,000 military advisors to South Vietnam. 1974 - The House Judiciary Committee approves the first article of impeachment against President Richard Nixon.
