What you need to know

U.S. and Iran trade direct strikes as Gulf war reignites

The U.S. and Iran exchanged direct military blows overnight, ending weeks of relative restraint and pushing the conflict back toward open confrontation across the Gulf. The trigger was Iran's apparent attempt to rebuild a mine-laying capability in the Strait of Hormuz after U.S. forces had cleared the waterway.

Washington framed its strike as narrow and defensive. Tehran called its response legitimate self-defense and warned states hosting U.S. forces could be next.

Shipping lanes are the real battleground

The strategic fight centers on control of Hormuz, not Iran's nuclear sites. Iran insists vessels must follow its rules to transit the strait; the U.S. is trying to keep the route open by force.

Commercial traffic has collapsed as a result, an economic signal of how effectively Iran has contested the waterway even under military pressure.

Unverified claims are shaping the narrative

Both sides are making claims that outpace confirmed facts, raising the risk of miscalculation. Iran says it downed a U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone over the strait; CENTCOM has not confirmed the loss.

President Donald Trump posted an AI-generated video appearing to show Iran's Kharg Island oil terminal destroyed, calling it "blown to smithereens." Iran's National Iranian Oil Company says operations there are continuing normally, and there is no evidence of an actual strike. A real attack on Kharg, which handles the bulk of Iran's seaborne crude exports, would mark a major escalation beyond the current pattern.

Washington pairs strikes with sanctions

The U.S. is combining military pressure with expanded economic isolation, preparing further secondary sanctions on banks handling Iranian funds. The USS George Washington Carrier Strike Group has now replaced the USS Abraham Lincoln in the region, signaling sustained U.S. naval commitment.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Tehran does not want a wider war but will respond decisively to further attacks.

Escalation trap…. Or something else?

No second U.S. strike wave has followed Iran's retaliation yet, leaving the next few hours pivotal. A repeating cycle has emerged: the U.S. clears mines, Iran tries to replace them, the U.S. strikes the units responsible, and Iran hits American-linked targets elsewhere in the region.

Birthplace of civilization

Iraq's militias split as disarmament deadline collides with Gulf war

Iraq's Iran-aligned armed factions are fracturing into two camps just as Washington and Tehran resume direct strikes across the Gulf. Asaib Ahl al-Haq is embedding itself inside the Iraqi state, while Kata'ib Hezbollah and Harakat Hezbollah al-Nujaba are defending an autonomous "resistance" model outside government control.

The renewed U.S.-Iran fighting hands the autonomist camp a stronger argument for keeping weapons independent, complicating Baghdad's 30 September disarmament deadline.

Maximalist demands mask a stalling tactic

Kata'ib Sayyid al-Shuhada has issued ten conditions before accepting even "regulation" of its weapons, including full U.S. troop withdrawal and Iraqi-controlled air defense systems. Kata'ib Hezbollah has gone further, tying disarmament talks to the dissolution of the Kurdish Peshmerga and removal of Turkish forces.

Most conditions sit well beyond Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi's authority to deliver. That gap looks deliberate: it lets factions claim to accept state sovereignty in principle while setting terms Baghdad cannot meet, shifting blame for missing the deadline onto the government.

Khazali bets on institutions, Kata'ib Hezbollah bets on guns

Asaib leader Qais al-Khazali is converting militia power into political-economic influence, using the Sadiqoun parliamentary bloc, PMF bureaucracy access, and state contracting networks. On 2 June, Asaib announced it would place weapons under state authority; Kata'ib Imam Ali followed. Kata'ib Hezbollah and Nujaba refused.

Kata'ib Hezbollah lacks Asaib's political vehicle strength, so its relevance depends on retaining military capability, clandestine networks, and Iranian ties. Whether Asaib's reported weapons transfers are substantive remains unverified, since equipment can move between Asaib-controlled and nominally state-controlled facilities without changing hands.

Gulf strikes strengthen the case for autonomy

U.S. forces struck two IRGC rocket launchers on Larak Island overnight 30-31 August, the first acknowledged U.S. strike on Iranian territory since late July. Iran retaliated with missiles and drones against U.S.-linked bases in Jordan and the UAE.

Every direct U.S.-Iran exchange reinforces Kata'ib Hezbollah's argument that Iraqi factions need independent weapons while foreign forces operate in the region. That dynamic directly undercuts Washington's push for Baghdad to establish a state monopoly on armed force.

Badr holds the swing vote

Hadi al-Ameri's Badr Organization, more embedded in state institutions than most rivals, has avoided fully backing Kata'ib Hezbollah's hardline position. If Badr sides with the accommodationist camp, Kata'ib Hezbollah and Nujaba risk political isolation within Shiite politics.

Muqtada al-Sadr supports state control of weapons but remains a separate, rival bloc to Khazali, meaning no unified pro-disarmament front currently exists.

Jurf al-Sakhr is the test to watch

South of Baghdad, Kata'ib Hezbollah has controlled Jurf al-Sakhr for over a decade. Reports indicate the government is weighing deployment of regular security forces there, a move that would test Baghdad's willingness to confront the faction directly rather than negotiate.

What’s next

Few expect full disarmament by 30 September; Baghdad is already framing the date as a process start rather than an endpoint. The critical variable is whether Asaib, Badr, and other accommodationist factions can build enough of a coalition to isolate Kata'ib Hezbollah and Nujaba.

It’s the U.S. vs China, everyone needs to pick a side

SCO summit tests whether multipolar rhetoric becomes leverage

Leaders from China, Russia, India, Pakistan, and Iran gather in Bishkek Monday for the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation's 25th anniversary summit, timed to a moment of maximum strain on the U.S.-led order. Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif are attending, hosted by Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov.

The SCO's ten members represent over 40% of the world's population and roughly a quarter of global economic output. The real question is whether that scale translates into coordinated action or stays symbolic.

Iran tests what SCO solidarity is worth

Pezeshkian arrives one day after U.S. forces struck Iranian rocket launchers on Larak Island in the Strait of Hormuz, with Iran retaliating against U.S.-linked facilities in Jordan. He wants visible political backing from Beijing and Moscow, both UN Security Council permanent members, to show Washington cannot isolate Tehran.

The SCO has condemned force against Iran before but remains a political forum, not a military alliance. Pezeshkian is expected to hold bilateral talks with Putin, while China stays Iran's largest oil buyer and economic lifeline.

Putin needs Bishkek to prove Russia isn't isolated

Putin's meeting with Xi comes as Moscow fights on in Ukraine while quietly reopening channels with Washington. CIA Director John Ratcliffe visited Moscow last week, the first such visit by a sitting CIA director since 2021, for talks President Donald Trump has linked to potential Ukraine war diplomacy.

Russia's economic dependence on China has deepened sharply since 2022 sanctions, giving Beijing outsized leverage in the relationship. Energy, military and technology cooperation, Iran, and Ukraine are all likely agenda items in the Xi-Putin talks, even if little is disclosed publicly.

India's balancing act is the summit's real test

Modi's India sits inside a China- and Russia-led bloc while also deepening Quad ties with the U.S., Japan, and Australia, buying Russian energy, and maintaining relations with both Israel and Iran. New Delhi has consistently blocked efforts to turn the SCO into an anti-Western bloc.

India-China relations remain strained by unresolved border disputes and competing regional ambitions, but both sides have incentive to prevent permanent rupture. A substantive Modi-Xi meeting would indicate the two countries' gradual rapprochement is holding.

Why the SCO's internal contradictions may not matter

The bloc holds together India and Pakistan as adversaries, India and China as competitors, and Central Asian states balancing Chinese economic ties against Russian security ties without cutting off the West. Iran wants protection from Washington; India wants no part of that fight.

These divisions have kept the SCO from acting as a unified bloc, and Beijing and Moscow appear to accept that. They're positioning the SCO and BRICS as parallel architecture reducing Western diplomatic dominance rather than as a replacement for existing institutions.

Implications

The summit's importance lies less in formal outcomes than in what the meeting represents: five major non-Western powers discussing wars, sanctions, and energy security without the U.S. or Western Europe in the room.

____________________

Empty chairs in Palau expose Pacific Forum's fracture lines

Pacific leaders open the Pacific Islands Forum in Palau Monday evening with at least five of 18 members represented below head-of-government level, including Fiji, Kiribati, Samoa, Solomon Islands, and Vanuatu. The weak turnout lands as China, Australia, and the U.S. compete for influence over a maritime region that controls key sea routes between Hawaii, Guam, East Asia, and Australia.

There's no evidence Beijing engineered any of the absences, but a less cohesive Forum benefits China regardless, particularly if members grow reluctant to take collective positions against it.

Two absences carry outsized weight

Solomon Islands Prime Minister Matthew Wale left Palau less than a day after arriving when a minister in his government filed a no-confidence motion against him. Wale had taken a more cautious line on Beijing than his predecessors, questioning China's security presence and criticizing its recent ballistic-missile test.

Fiji Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka, architect of the region's "Ocean of Peace" initiative, is also absent as Fiji heads toward a general election due by early 2027. Rabuka has argued against letting the Pacific become a proxy battleground, even as Fiji itself signed the Ocean of Peace Alliance mutual-defense pact with Australia in July.

Bilateral deals are outpacing collective action

Australia has built a dense web of defense agreements across the region: the Falepili Union with Tuvalu, a strategic treaty with Nauru, the Pukpuk Mutual Defence Treaty with Papua New Guinea, the Nakamal Agreement with Vanuatu, and now the Ocean of Peace Alliance with Fiji. Many contain clauses limiting third-country security footholds, aimed squarely at China.

The U.S. maintains deep leverage through Compacts of Free Association with Palau, the Marshall Islands, and the Federated States of Micronesia, trading financial assistance for defense authority and military access. Washington is expanding radar, airfield, and missile-related infrastructure across the northern Pacific.

China counters through economic and diplomatic reach

Beijing's most consequential move remains the 2022 security agreement with Solomon Islands, which alarmed Australia, New Zealand, and the U.S. over fears of eventual Chinese military access. China has since deepened ties with Cook Islands, signed Belt and Road agreements with Nauru, and financed infrastructure in Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Vanuatu, and Solomon Islands.

Taiwan recognition remains a live fault line. Solomon Islands and Kiribati switched to Beijing in 2019, and Nauru followed in 2024, leaving Palau, the Marshall Islands, and Tuvalu among Taiwan's few remaining diplomatic partners.

Implications

The Forum's core function, giving small states collective weight, is being hollowed out by a proliferation of bilateral defense and infrastructure deals with Australia, China, and the U.S. running in parallel.

____________________

Japan's defense buildup pivots from platforms to autonomy

Japan is requesting a record ¥8.9 trillion ($55.6 billion) defense budget for the fiscal year starting April 2027, slightly above this year's ¥8.85 trillion allocation. The real shift isn't the topline number but the composition: Tokyo is moving away from conventional platforms like ships and aircraft toward drones, AI, and long-range strike systems built for a high-technology fight around Japan's southwestern islands.

The final figure could rise further, since several proposed programs still lack finalized cost estimates.

Long-range strike and AI move to the center

The Defense Ministry is prioritizing long-range unmanned attack aircraft, advanced missile systems, and submarine-launched long-range missiles as part of Japan's expanding "counterstrike" capability, the ability to hit launch sites and military targets inside enemy territory. An integrated AI system to help commanders process battlefield data in real time is also being funded, alongside expanded ministry computing and cloud infrastructure.

Cheap attack drones are being developed alongside more sophisticated surveillance and combat platforms, a direct lesson from Ukraine, where low-cost drones have destroyed far more expensive equipment. The push also addresses Japan's shrinking, aging population, autonomous systems and AI-assisted command reduce the personnel needed to operate military units.

The postwar division of labor with Washington is eroding

Japan's traditional model had the Self-Defense Forces handle territorial defense while the U.S. supplied offensive firepower. That line is blurring as Japan acquires weapons capable of striking targets hundreds or thousands of kilometers away and deepens integrated operations with U.S. forces.

The current trajectory traces back to the 2022 national security strategy under former Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, which committed roughly ¥43 trillion to defense over five years and formally embraced counterstrike capability, one of the most significant doctrinal shifts since the Self-Defense Forces were created in the 1950s. Japan hit defense spending equivalent to about 2% of GDP earlier than planned.

Washington is pushing for more, not less

The Trump administration is pressing Tokyo toward defense spending of at least 3.5% of GDP, adding pressure on Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi as her government finalizes revisions to the National Security Strategy, National Defense Strategy, and Defense Buildup Program.

China's military expansion remains the primary driver, with North Korea's missile program and increased Russian activity in East Asia reinforcing the case.

A structural shift

The ¥8.9 trillion request is a marker in a structural shift, not a one-off increase tied to a single crisis. Japan is retaining its constitutional constraints but building a military increasingly capable of operating well beyond narrow territorial defense.

Instability from Sahel to Horn of Africa amid state fragility, Russian interference, & Islamist insurgencies

Niger's junta survives coup attempt, but Russia had to save it

Niger's military government has regained control of Niamey after roughly 24 hours of fighting suppressed an attempted coup by disaffected soldiers, the most serious internal challenge to General Abdourahamane Tiani's rule since he seized power in 2023. The revolt exposes deep dissatisfaction inside the armed forces and confirms how completely Niger's alignment has shifted from France toward Russia.

President Tiani has not made a public appearance since the fighting began, though Prime Minister Ali Mahaman Lamine Zeine and senior commanders have appeared publicly and government institutions remain functional.

The uprising and the crackdown

Fighting began around midnight Friday, 28 August, when soldiers at Base 101, the military installation at Diori Hamani International Airport, detained comrades and opened fire before the violence spread toward the presidential palace. Base 101 is back under government control and airport activity has resumed.

The rebels appear to have been mostly younger officers from units fighting Islamic State and al-Qaeda-linked insurgents in Ouallam, Téra, and Dosso, regions that have suffered heavy recent losses. An attack roughly a week before the mutiny killed at least 18 soldiers in Dosso, and the Niamey airport complex has already been hit repeatedly by Islamist militants this year.

Russia's Africa Corps did the fighting France used to do

Russia's Africa Corps, which maintains several hundred personnel in Niger, provided ground and aerial support to loyalist forces retaking Base 101. Russian Ambassador Viktor Voropayev confirmed Nigerien authorities requested the assistance and credited it with helping defeat the mutineers.

Algeria backed Niamey too, flying four combat aircraft into the capital Sunday alongside an IL-78 tanker and an IL-76 transport aircraft. The irony is direct: Tiani justified the 2023 coup partly as restoring sovereignty from foreign troops, yet his government's survival this weekend depended on foreign military intervention, just from Moscow and Algiers instead of Paris and Washington.

Uranium nationalization capped the break with France

France's last troops left Niger on 22 December 2023 after the junta revoked defense agreements; the roughly 1,500-strong French deployment and the $100+ million U.S. Air Base 201 at Agadez were both wound down. Niger joined the Confederation of Sahel States with Mali and Burkina Faso and left ECOWAS.

The economic break followed on 19 June 2025, when Niamey nationalized SOMAÏR, the uranium miner in which French firm Orano held a 63.4% stake versus 36.6% for Niger's SOPAMIN. Orano called it expropriation and launched international arbitration. Niger has since revoked Orano's permit for the Imouraren uranium project and signed a December 2025 cooperation deal with Uranium One, part of Russia's Rosatom group.

What to watch

Tiani built his legitimacy on two promises: sovereignty and security. Sovereignty has been perceived to be be delivered, French and U.S. forces are gone, uranium control has shifted to the state, and Russia and Algeria are now the security guarantors. Security has not: the jihadist insurgency that justified the 2023 coup remains active, and battlefield frustration inside the army is now the same force threatening the government that promised to fix it.

Sign up link: https://www.center-of-gravity.info

Inside Track: https://www.center-of-gravity.info/upgrade