Attio is the agentic CRM that runs the work behind every win. It meets you where you work, compounds every customer signal into context, then acts on it so you can move fast, stay sharp, and scale without breaking.

Then Ask Attio to:

30,000+ teams use Attio to drive more revenue at scale.

Try Attio Now

What you need to know

War resumes officially as Trump notifies Congress

President Donald Trump has told Congress that U.S. military hostilities against Iran resumed on July 7, formally ending the fiction that the June ceasefire still holds. The notification isn't a war declaration and doesn't authorize the campaign, but it starts a new 60-day clock the administration says lets Trump continue operations without further congressional sign-off.

Democrats and some Republicans reject that reading, arguing the president can't reset the statutory clock by pausing and restarting the same conflict. Both chambers already passed a resolution in June ordering withdrawal from Iran hostilities, which the White House dismissed as legally meaningless.

Blockade returns at full force

Central Command resumes blockading traffic to and from Iranian ports at 4pm ET (2000 GMT) on July 14, restoring the posture it ran between April 13 and June 18. This marks a shift to sustained economic and maritime coercion aimed specifically at trade serving Iran, not general Hormuz transit.

The first intercepted vessel, whether an Iranian escort attempt or a tanker's refusal to comply, is the likely next flashpoint.

Strikes intensify, Iran hits back

U.S. forces carried out five hours of strikes early on July 14, the third straight night of attacks on missile and drone facilities, naval assets, coastal surveillance, ammunition depots and communications infrastructure. CENTCOM says it hit roughly 140 targets on July 11 alone, and more than 300 in the first three nights of renewed strikes.

Iran is proving it retains real retaliatory reach despite the pressure. The Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) fired ballistic missiles at a U.S. base in Jordan on July 14; Jordan intercepted four missiles but there's no confirmation the base itself was hit. Tehran has also launched at Bahrain and other Gulf hosts of U.S. forces.

Oil markets and shipping absorb the shock

Brent and WTI posted some of their largest daily jumps in years after the blockade announcement. Roughly one-fifth of global oil and gas traffic normally transits Hormuz daily, and commercial shipping volumes have already dropped to their lowest level in about two months as insurers and operators price in missile, drone and mine risk.

Iran doesn't need to physically close the strait to inflict damage; the credible threat of attack is enough to push freight and insurance costs up and deter transits, even with U.S. forces escorting ships and clearing mines.

Europe moves to choke IRGC networks

The UK government announced on July 13 that the IRGC will be among the first groups designated under new state-threats powers, pending parliamentary approval. The mechanism differs legally from terrorism proscription but achieves a similar practical effect: prosecutors won't need to prove the foreign-power link case by case.

London cites at least 20 potentially lethal Iranian-backed plots identified by MI5 in the past year, plus IRGC Quds Force operations against Jewish, Israeli-linked and Persian-language media targets in Britain.

Next

The blockade's first real test comes at sea: how Iran responds to interception attempts, and how U.S. forces handle the first noncompliant vessel, will likely determine whether this stays a bounded exchange or tips into broader regional war. Diplomacy hasn't fully collapsed, but the June memorandum is effectively dead, and Washington's conditions (an end to shipping attacks, guaranteed Hormuz access) remain unmet.

Birthplace of civilization

Eisenkot pulls ahead of Netanyahu as Israel heads to October vote

Israel's next general election, set for October 27, 2026, will be the first national vote since the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack and the wars that followed in Gaza, Lebanon and Iran. Former IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot's new Yashar party has edged past Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud in the latest polling, marking the first time in years Netanyahu faces a challenger with comparable security credibility.

The shift matters because Eisenkot isn't running from the left. He's contesting Netanyahu on hawkish turf, which strips Netanyahu of his usual security advantage without handing the race to the traditional opposition.

Coalition math, not seat count, decides this

The real fight is arithmetic. Netanyahu's bloc of Likud, ultra-Orthodox parties and nationalist religious factions polls around 52 seats, short of the 61 needed to govern the 120-seat Knesset. Opposition parties collectively outnumber him only if Arab-led parties are included, and Bennett and Lieberman have both resisted relying on them before.

That gap is Netanyahu's opening. His strategy may shift from beating Eisenkot outright to simply blocking the opposition from uniting.

Four issues will define the campaign

Security, accountability for October 7, ultra-Orthodox conscription and the economy will dominate. Netanyahu will lean on his wartime record against Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas, plus his relationship with US President Donald Trump.

The accountability question is a live flashpoint. The government wants a politically appointed probe; the opposition wants an independent state commission of inquiry, a divide feeding accusations Netanyahu is dodging scrutiny.

Conscription exemptions strain the coalition

Netanyahu needs Shas and United Torah Judaism to stay in government, but secular voters and military reservists are increasingly angry over broad ultra-Orthodox exemptions from service. This tension has no easy resolution before October and could bleed votes from Netanyahu's bloc regardless of the broader race.

Economic strain and unresolved judiciary disputes over the balance of power between government and courts add further pressure, though neither is likely to be the deciding factor.

Key variables

Eisenkot is the strongest challenger to emerge in years, but the race remains fluid. A regional escalation, a hostage deal breakthrough, a party merger, or a small faction missing the threshold could all flip the outcome.

Bennett and Lieberman might soften on relying on Arab-led parties, which might become a key variable for the opposition.

__________

Yemen's four-year truce cracks open

Yemen has entered its most dangerous stretch since the informal 2022 truce, after Houthi forces struck Saudi Arabia and government-aligned forces hit Sana'a International Airport to block an Iranian aircraft from landing. Both sides now describe the de-escalation period as over, not paused.

The trigger came July 13, when forces loyal to Yemen's internationally recognized government struck the Sana'a runway to stop a Mahan Air flight the Defense Ministry called a sovereignty violation. The plane diverted to Hodeidah, becoming the first international flight to land there since 2015; it was carrying a Houthi delegation returning from Ali Khamenei's funeral in Iran.

Government tries to contain, not escalate

Presidential Leadership Council chairman Rashad al-Alimi ordered forces not to widen the confrontation and prioritized civilian safety, while warning Sana'a and Hodeidah airports will no longer tolerate unauthorized flights. That's a narrow, deliberate line: punish the sovereignty breach, avoid full-scale reignition.

Yemen's Cabinet moved into permanent session to track the crisis. Reports conflicted over whether airports nationwide had closed; the Transport Ministry denied a full shutdown. The UN Security Council took up the escalation, with officials warning Yemen can't survive another major war cycle.

Tribal revolt tests Houthi authority in Al-Jawf

A bizarre identity dispute has become a serious internal challenge to Houthi control. A woman calling herself "Mira Saddam Hussein," identified by Houthi authorities as Sumaya Ahmed Mohammed al-Zubairi, claimed to be an unacknowledged daughter of the late Iraqi president; Saddam Hussein's recognized daughter Raghad denies it. Houthis accuse her of impersonation and forgery.

The woman sought protection from Sheikh Hamad bin Fadgham al-Hazmi, alleging Houthi-linked figures including former Saada governor Fares Mana'a seized her property in Sana'a. Both she and Bin Fadgham were detained; he was released after roughly 50 days, she reportedly remains in custody. Bin Fadgham then issued a nakf, a tribal call to mobilize, and delegations from Dahm, Bakil, Naham and other communities have gathered at the "Matarah al-Karama" encampment in the Al-Rayyan desert.

The real issue isn't her identity. It's whether the Houthis can detain someone under tribal protection without consequence, a direct test of customary law versus Houthi authority after years of the group incorporating or coercing tribal networks.

Southern tribes add a second pressure point

Groups in Lahj, Abyan, Shabwa and Hadramout are separately mobilizing against a planned prisoner exchange between the government and Houthis, objecting to including people convicted of assassination and terrorism offenses. Protesters argue criminal cases shouldn't be folded into wartime detainee swaps.

The exchange has stalled, with the government and Houthis blaming each other. This isn't linked to the Al-Jawf mobilization, but both show tribal structures increasingly stepping in to override political decisions, a pattern that weakens central authority on both sides of the conflict.

Security instability spreads at the edges

Six small boats approached a tanker about 50 nautical miles (58 miles / 93km) south of Aden; the ship's armed security fired warning shots and the boats withdrew with no casualties or damage.

Separately, gunmen assassinated a neighborhood official in Aden's Dar Saad district, with arrests announced in coordination with Abyan authorities. It's a reminder that government-held territory remains unstable even before factoring in the Houthi and tribal fronts.

Implications

Three risks are now interconnected: renewed Houthi-Saudi strikes could revive the war's regional dimension, the Al-Jawf mobilization could turn into a direct internal challenge to Houthi rule, and southern anger over the prisoner exchange could fracture the anti-Houthi coalition further.

Alimi's restraint order and the lack of casualties at Abha leave a mediation window open. But the Houthi declaration that de-escalation is over, combined with active tribal mobilization, puts Yemen closer to a full resumption of conflict than at any point since 2022.

__________

Iraqi prime minister to meet President Trump today

Ali al-Zaidi is expected to use his first White House meeting to push for U.S. investment while facing pressure over militias, Iranian influence and financial controls.

al-Zaidi is due to meet U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House today at 1100 as Baghdad seeks to recast its relationship with Washington around investment, energy and economic cooperation.

Trump is scheduled to receive al-Zaidi at the White House at 11:00 a.m. Washington time, followed by talks in the Oval Office. The meeting will be al-Zaidi’s most important engagement during a visit that began on 13 July and is expected to continue until 18 July.

Al-Zaidi arrived in Washington at the head of a government and business delegation. The Iraqi government has presented the trip as an effort to deepen bilateral relations and attract U.S. investment, particularly in the oil, gas, electricity and infrastructure sectors.

Energy is expected to dominate the public agenda. Iraqi officials are seeking greater involvement from American companies in upstream oil production, gas processing, electricity generation and export infrastructure. Discussions have reportedly included possible cooperation with Chevron, HKN Energy and General Electric.

Baghdad is also looking for U.S. support for projects designed to increase production capacity and reduce Iraq’s dependence on energy imports from Iran. Iraqi officials are particularly interested in developing gas resources that could ease chronic electricity shortages and reduce the country’s reliance on Iranian gas and power supplies.

Al-Zaidi is expected to argue that Iraq should be treated as a strategic economic partner rather than primarily as a security problem. His government hopes that closer commercial ties with the United States will help create jobs, attract technology and strengthen Iraq’s position as a regional energy producer.

The White House, however, is likely to focus heavily on security and Iran.

The Trump administration is expected to press al-Zaidi for stronger action against Iran-backed armed groups operating inside Iraq. Washington also wants tighter controls on the Iraqi banking system to prevent U.S. dollars from reaching sanctioned groups or being transferred to Iran.

Other U.S. priorities are likely to include protection for American diplomatic and commercial personnel, a reduction in Iranian influence over Iraqi institutions, and greater control by the Iraqi state over militias and other armed factions.

Baghdad has said that weapons must ultimately come under state authority. The government has also established a target date of 30 September for armed groups to surrender or regularize their weapons, although the practical implementation of that policy remains uncertain.

Some factions have indicated that they may be willing to negotiate their integration into state structures. More hardline groups, however, remain opposed to disarmament and have criticized al-Zaidi’s visit to Washington.

The meeting therefore presents both an opportunity and a political risk for the Iraqi prime minister.

Al-Zaidi is seeking a public endorsement from Trump and tangible economic commitments that he can present as evidence of the benefits of closer relations with the United States. At the same time, he must avoid appearing to be implementing American demands at the expense of Iraqi sovereignty.

Trump is likely to welcome al-Zaidi as a more business-oriented Iraqi partner while demanding measurable progress on militias, sanctions enforcement and energy independence.

The most likely outcome is a series of commercial memorandums and preliminary agreements rather than a major strategic accord. The two governments may also issue broad language supporting Iraqi sovereignty, investment and the principle that all weapons should be controlled by the state.

A breakthrough on militia disarmament is less likely. Iraqi armed groups remain deeply embedded in the political and security system, and any attempt to dismantle them rapidly could destabilize al-Zaidi’s government.

The most sensitive question will be whether Trump publicly sets deadlines or conditions for Baghdad. Explicit demands could strengthen al-Zaidi’s hand against armed factions, but they could also allow his opponents to portray him as acting under U.S. pressure.

The White House meeting is therefore expected to be warm in tone but difficult in substance. Al-Zaidi wants investment and political support. Trump wants action against Iranian influence and greater security for U.S. interests.

The success of the visit will depend less on the public statements issued in Washington than on whether al-Zaidi can translate any U.S. commitments into investment while delivering enough progress on militias and financial controls to satisfy the Trump administration.

The new Monroe Doctrine with a Trump Corollary

Trump confirms probe into Iranian drones in Cuba

President Donald Trump said on July 13 that the U.S. is investigating reports Iran positioned military drones in Cuba, the clearest acknowledgment yet that Washington is taking the claims seriously at the top level. He didn't name the investigating agency, describe the supporting intelligence, or say whether the aircraft are Cuban-owned or Iranian-operated.

That ownership question matters strategically. Cuban control would mark a real expansion of Havana's military capability; Iranian control would mean Tehran is building a retaliatory foothold near the U.S. mainland while under active American attack. Washington has released no satellite imagery, technical assessments or other public evidence to settle it.

Unverified claims, real strategic stakes

The allegations trace back to May reporting, citing classified U.S. intelligence, that Cuba acquired more than 300 military drones from Russia and Iran since 2023. Cuban officials reportedly discussed potential operations against Guantánamo Bay, nearby U.S. naval assets and Key West, Florida, though the assessment stopped short of calling an attack imminent.

Washington hasn't clarified whether the reported total includes armed strike drones, reconnaissance aircraft, tactical systems, unassembled parts or training platforms, a distinction that determines how serious the threat actually is. Cuba denies preparing any attack and accuses the Trump administration of building a pretext for more economic pressure or military action, but Havana has also offered no details on its own drone inventory.

Comparisons to 1962, with a key difference

The episode invites comparison to the Cuban Missile Crisis, but the evidentiary base is far weaker. Soviet nuclear missiles in 1962 were photographed and publicly documented; the current claims rest largely on classified intelligence from unnamed officials, with no public confirmation of the drones' existence, number or readiness.

Sanctions pressure already escalating

The drone probe lands amid a broader U.S. squeeze on Cuba. The Trump administration has expanded sanctions on Cuban government institutions, military-linked businesses, port operators and energy and trade firms, and has used secondary-sanctions threats to discourage fuel suppliers from dealing with Havana.

That pressure is deepening an already severe Cuban energy crisis, marked by prolonged blackouts and transportation breakdowns. Trump has repeatedly signaled the U.S. could take stronger action against Cuba once the Iran confrontation is resolved.

So what?

The drone allegations give Washington a ready-made national-security rationale for expanding surveillance and force protection in the Caribbean, think added aerial and maritime reconnaissance, more air-defense assets in southern Florida, and tighter protection at Guantánamo Bay. Sanctions on foreign suppliers of Cuban military equipment are also a likely next step.

More aggressive moves, like inspection demands or direct action against suspected drone sites, would require a far stronger public evidence base than exists now. The nearer-term risk isn't an actual attack, it's that an unverified allegation becomes the trigger for military escalation while the U.S. is already engaged with both Iran and, potentially, Cuba.

The ultimate complex system

Inflation returns just as growth loses its footing

The global economy is entering the second half of 2026 with less room to maneuver. Growth stays positive but inflation has reaccelerated, labor markets are cooling, and the U.S.-Iran conflict is layering a fresh energy shock onto an already fragile base.

The U.S. remains the main engine of global demand, but that engine is running unevenly. GDP grew at an annualized 2.1% in Q1, up from just 0.5% in Q4 2025, driven by business investment, tech spending, government outlays and exports. Underlying demand tells a weaker story: final sales to private domestic purchasers rose only 1.7%, and retail, wholesale and financial activity contracted even as the headline number looked solid.

Inflation reaccelerates as oil spikes

U.S. consumer-price inflation hit 4.2% in May, the highest since April 2023; core inflation ran at 2.9%. The Fed's preferred gauge, core PCE, reached 3.4%, well above the 2% target. A June gasoline price dip offered brief relief, but that's now being overwritten by the Iran conflict.

Brent crude topped $85 a barrel and WTI passed $80 on July 14 as the blockade and falling tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz raised supply fears. That reverses the disinflation narrative just as it was starting to take hold, and gives the Federal Reserve grounds to hold rates higher for longer rather than start cutting.

Labor market loses its cushioning power

The U.S. added only 57,000 jobs in June while unemployment held at 4.2%. Labor-force participation fell to 61.5%, and long-term unemployment rose from a year earlier. Professional services, health care and social assistance kept hiring; leisure and hospitality shed jobs.

This isn't a collapse, but it means workers have less bargaining power to offset high prices. Combined with a housing market where existing-home sales fell 2.4% in June and the median sale price hit a record $440,600, the interest-rate-sensitive parts of the economy are absorbing most of the pain.

Growth splits sharply by region

The IMF expects global growth to slow from 3.5% in 2025 to 3% this year, with inflation rising from 4.1% to 4.7% before easing in 2027. The OECD (2.8%) and World Bank (2.5%) are more pessimistic, but all three point the same direction: slower growth, higher inflation, wider gaps between regions.

China's export machine is masking domestic weakness. Exports rose 27% and imports 36% in June, producing a $125.6 billion monthly trade surplus built on semiconductors, computing equipment, EVs and AI-linked goods. But property activity stays weak and household spending subdued, meaning China is leaning harder on exports to offset a soft domestic economy.

Europe is the most exposed major economy. Euro-area growth is near stagnation, and even though inflation eased to an estimated 2.8% in June from 3.2% in May, energy prices remain well above year-ago levels. The European Central Bank raised its deposit rate to 2.25% in June, and heavy reliance on imported energy leaves the bloc particularly vulnerable to a prolonged Hormuz disruption.

Gulf-adjacent economies take the direct hit

The Middle East and Central Asia are absorbing the most immediate damage as oil production, shipping and export routes are disrupted. Iraq, Kuwait and Qatar are especially exposed given their dependence on hydrocarbon exports and regional maritime infrastructure, meaning any extension of the Hormuz blockade hits them first and hardest.

What to watch

The most likely path is slower but still-positive global growth, sticky inflation and restrictive monetary policy, with AI investment, tech exports and non-Gulf energy production providing the main buffers against recession. The central risk is a prolonged Hormuz disruption pushing oil, gas, fertilizer and shipping costs sharply higher, which would erode household purchasing power and force central banks to delay cuts or hike again.

Sign up link: https://www.center-of-gravity.info

Inside Track: https://www.center-of-gravity.info/upgrade