- The U.S.–Iran conflict continues to escalate, with Washington expanding strikes deep into Iran while enforcing a maritime blockade. Hormuz traffic has fallen by roughly 90%, and Iran retains enough missile and drone capability to threaten shipping, Gulf states, and U.S. assets. Diplomacy has largely collapsed, leaving a limited maritime ceasefire as the most plausible near-term off-ramp. - Meanwhile, Washington has opened a major trade confrontation with Brazil, imposing 25% tariffs on most imports from 22 July. Brazil is preparing retaliation and a WTO challenge, making the dispute a test case for a wider U.S. Section 301 campaign that could later target China, India, Japan, Mexico, South Korea and the EU. - U.S.–Mexico relations are also deteriorating over DEA allegations linking the Mexican state to cartels and Mexico’s legal action over migrant deaths in U.S. custody. - Elsewhere, Nayib Bukele has secured nomination for a third Salvadoran presidential term, reinforcing his model of centralized rule. - Britain is moving toward economic nationalism as Andy Burnham prepares to become prime minister and British Steel is nationalized. - In Africa, a severe Ebola outbreak in the DRC is driving U.S. travel restrictions, disrupting medical deployments and delaying critical-minerals diplomacy, while Uganda approaches regional outbreak-free status. |
Center of Gravity
What you need to know
Strikes escalate as Hormuz traffic nearly vanishes
The U.S. has moved from targeted strikes to active blockade enforcement, marking the most aggressive phase of the conflict since it began. Between July 9 and 16, American operations expanded beyond coastal missile, drone, and naval sites to hit military facilities near Tehran, Semnan, and Sistan and Baluchestan. Washington also began physically intercepting tanker traffic bound for Iranian ports.
The shift from air campaign to naval interdiction changes the calculus entirely. Iran now faces pressure on both its military infrastructure and its export lifeline simultaneously.
U.S. Central Command reported roughly 140 targets hit on July 11 alone, and more than 300 over three consecutive nights.
The U.S. disabled the Curaçao-flagged tanker Belma near Kharg Island and redirected two additional vessels.
Iran absorbs heavy losses, retains strike capability
Iranian authorities claim more than 35 people killed and over 300 wounded in July, though these figures are unverified. Despite the toll, Tehran has not lost the ability to threaten shipping or regional U.S. assets, which is the more important operational fact.
No confirmed Israeli strike hit Iranian territory during this period, keeping Israel a latent rather than active second front. Covert Israeli intelligence support remains plausible but unconfirmed.
Targets included air defenses, anti-ship weapons, missile and drone infrastructure, and coastal radar at Bushehr, Jask, Konarak, Chabahar, Bandar Abbas, Abu Musa, and Greater Tunb Island.
Hormuz shipping collapses without a formal closure
Iran has proven it can strangle Hormuz traffic without ever declaring the strait closed. Daily crossings have dropped from a pre-war range of 125 to 138 vessels down to just 7 to 13, a collapse of roughly 90%. Some vessels are running dark without AIS transponders, so the real figures could be higher, but the trend is unmistakable.
This matters because it shows deterrence through dispersed capability rather than territorial control. Iran doesn't need to hold Hormuz. It just needs enough surviving missile and drone assets to make safe passage unguaranteeable.
Iran's cruise-missile strike on the UAE-owned tankers Mombasa B and Al Bahyah in Omani waters killed one Indian sailor and wounded eight crew members.
Tehran claimed the vessels had entered a restricted route, its most operationally significant retaliatory success to date.
Diplomacy stalls as Trump raises the stakes
President Donald Trump notified Congress on July 13 that hostilities with Iran had resumed, though this was not a war declaration or authorization. Trump has threatened further strikes on power infrastructure, Kharg Island, and nuclear-related sites unless Tehran returns to negotiations.
The June Islamabad memorandum of understanding has effectively collapsed. Washington and Tehran can't agree on whether it ever recognized Iranian authority over Hormuz management, which removes the one diplomatic framework that existed. Oman, Qatar, and Pakistan continue indirect contacts, but a comprehensive nuclear or security deal looks unlikely in the near term. A narrower maritime arrangement remains the more realistic outcome.
Spillover hits Gulf states, Iraq, and Lebanon
Retaliation has spread unevenly across the region without escalating into full-scale war on any single front. Gulf states intercepted numerous missiles and drones, but debris still injured three people in Qatar, and Kuwait reported damage including a strike on an oil-drilling platform.
Iraq and Lebanon remain secondary rather than active fronts, for now. Eight drones were intercepted over Erbil on July 15 near the U.S. consulate and coalition facilities, but Baghdad has not entered a nationwide militia campaign. In Lebanon, Israel continues localized drone strikes, artillery fire, and demolitions in the south, while Hezbollah has largely held back from major attacks.
Bahrain, Oman, Qatar, and Jordan face repeated threats or strikes on facilities tied to U.S. forces.
Two U.S. carrier strike groups and the Boxer Amphibious Ready Group remain positioned in the Arabian Sea and Gulf of Oman, backed by destroyers and amphibious forces across the Mediterranean, Red Sea, and Indian Ocean.
Scenarios
The most likely near-term path is continued U.S. strikes and blockade enforcement met by selective Iranian attacks on vessels and regional targets. Best case: a limited maritime ceasefire that restores commercial passage. Worst case: a prolonged Hormuz shutdown, strikes on Gulf energy infrastructure, and expansion into Iraq, Lebanon, and Israel.
The core strategic problem for Washington remains unresolved:
Degrading Iran's fixed infrastructure hasn't broken its capacity to keep shipping and energy markets under sustained threat.
Known Unknowns: The impact of U.S. tariffs on international trade & especially the U.S. bond market. Whether U.S./Israel war on Iran will return to high intensity operations. What impact this war will have on the global economy. Relations of new Syrian government with Israel, international community & ability to maintain stability inside Syria. China’s triggers for military action against Taiwan. U.S. and allied responses to China’s ‘grey zone’ warfare in the South China Sea and north Asia. Ukraine’s ability to withstand Russia’s war of attrition. The potential for the jihadist insurgency in Africa’s Sahel region to consolidate and spread.
Latin America
New Monroe Doctrine with a Trump Corollary
Washington opens major trade front against Brazil
The U.S. moves to impose a 25% tariff on most Brazilian imports starting July 22, launching one of the largest bilateral trade disputes in decades. The timing matters more than the target: this is the first real-world test of Washington's replacement tariff mechanism since the Supreme Court struck down the prior system used to impose broad import duties.
The tariff hits sugar, steel, machinery, apparel, and a wide range of manufactured and agricultural goods. Washington carved out exemptions for politically sensitive categories, protecting some of Brazil's most valuable exports while still exposing large parts of its industrial base.
Exempted goods include beef, coffee, aircraft, energy products, and rare earths.
A separate U.S. forced-labor investigation could add a further 12.5% tariff on affected Brazilian products, stacking pressure on top of the initial measure.
Brazil moves to retaliate and litigate
Brasília is preparing countermeasures and is expected to challenge the tariffs at the World Trade Organization. How forcefully Brazil responds will be watched closely by every other government facing a similar threat, since a strong Brazilian pushback or a successful WTO challenge could weaken Washington's legal footing before it applies the same model elsewhere.
The stakes are compounding. If Brazil escalates and the forced-labor tariff lands on top of the existing 25%, affected sectors could face a combined rate above 35%, a level that risks disrupting industrial supply chains and squeezing producers who already have thin margins.
Brazil case sets the template for a wider campaign
The bigger story isn't Brazil. It's the roughly 80 Section 301 investigations the administration has reportedly opened, using a Trade Act provision that permits tariffs and other restrictions against practices deemed unfair or discriminatory. Brazil becomes the proving ground for this legal and political approach.
Countries potentially exposed to similar Section 301 action include China, India, Japan, Mexico, South Korea, and the European Union.
A durable win in the Brazil case gives Washington a replicable model. A weak outcome, especially a WTO loss, could stall the broader campaign before it scales.
The most consequential indicator isn't the tariff itself but Brazil's response and the WTO's handling of the challenge. A quick Brazilian retaliation paired with a credible WTO case would test whether Section 301 can survive scrutiny as the legal backbone of the post-Supreme Court tariff strategy. If Brazil folds or the WTO challenge stalls, expect Washington to move quickly toward the next targets on its list.
__________
Sheinbaum rejects DEA's cartel-state claim
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has publicly rejected accusations from U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration chief Terry Cole that the Mexican government is effectively indistinguishable from criminal organizations. Sheinbaum called the claim politically motivated, a direct challenge to Washington's framing of the security relationship.
This isn't just a war of words. Sheinbaum is drawing a hard line that any future security cooperation must respect Mexican sovereignty, which narrows the room Washington has to push joint enforcement operations or unilateral action inside Mexican territory.
Migrant deaths turn into a legal and diplomatic fight
Mexico has filed criminal complaints in the United States over the deaths of at least 14 Mexican citizens in immigration detention, along with additional deaths tied to enforcement operations. This moves the dispute from diplomatic friction into an active legal confrontation on U.S. soil.
Mexico City has also asked the U.N. human-rights system to investigate the cases, internationalizing a domestic enforcement issue. That move raises the reputational cost for Washington regardless of how the U.S. legal complaints proceed.
Criminal complaints cover at least 14 detention deaths plus separate fatalities during enforcement operations.
The U.N. request adds an international oversight track that runs independent of the U.S. court process.
What began as a security dispute is now a sovereignty fight
The combination of the DEA allegations and the migrant death complaints has broadened the confrontation well beyond drug enforcement cooperation. What started as a disagreement over cartel influence claims now touches migration policy, sovereignty, and international human rights scrutiny simultaneously.
This matters because it reduces Sheinbaum's political room to cooperate quietly with Washington on security matters, even where doing so might serve Mexican interests, since any concession now risks looking like capitulation on sovereignty.
__________
Bukele secures nomination for third presidential term
El Salvador’s ruling Nuevas Ideas party has formally selected President Nayib Bukele as its candidate for the February 2027 election, clearing the way for him to seek a third term. Constitutional reforms passed in 2025 permit indefinite reelection and extend presidential terms from five to six years.
Bukele remains highly popular following a sharp reduction in violent crime, although critics view the reforms as further authoritarian consolidation.
His model of centralized power, mass detention and electoral dominance is also becoming increasingly influential among security-focused politicians elsewhere in Latin America.
African Tinderbox
Instability from Sahel to Horn of Africa amid state fragility, Russian interference, & Islamist insurgencies
DRC outbreak becomes region's top health emergency
The Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo has grown into Africa's most urgent cross-border health crisis, with 2,011 confirmed cases and 754 deaths recorded by July 15. That puts the case fatality rate near 37.5%, a level that explains why the international response is escalating so quickly.
The scale of the outbreak is now driving policy responses well beyond public health, touching travel restrictions, mineral diplomacy, and regional containment efforts simultaneously.
U.S. travel ban risks weakening the response
The United States has barred anyone who visited the DRC in the previous 21 days, including U.S. citizens, from boarding commercial flights to the country. Health officials warn this could reduce medical deployments and treatment operations exactly when they're needed most, creating a direct tension between border security and outbreak containment.
This is the core risk to watch. A policy meant to protect the U.S. could end up slowing the international medical response inside DRC, potentially prolonging the outbreak it's designed to guard against.
Critical minerals talks stall as crisis deepens
The outbreak is delaying talks tied to a U.S.-backed initiative to secure access to Congolese cobalt, copper, and other critical minerals. This connects a public health emergency directly to global supply chain strategy, since DRC remains a dominant global source for cobalt used in battery production.
Any prolonged delay here has consequences beyond the region. Slower access negotiations could push manufacturers and governments to accelerate diversification away from Congolese sources, reshaping mineral supply chains regardless of how the outbreak itself resolves.
Uganda nears the finish line
Uganda was expected to discharge its final Ebola patient on July 16, starting the 42-day countdown required before the country can be declared outbreak-free. Uganda's trajectory offers a rare comparison point showing containment can work, even as DRC's numbers keep climbing.
Uganda's 42-day clock begins only after the last confirmed case clears, meaning a single new infection would restart the countdown.
New Europe
Europe's center of gravity shifts east, politics moves right, hostility to migrants from the south rises, as ties with the U.S. fray, and fear of Russia increases
Burnham set to take power as Britain's seventh PM in a decade
Andy Burnham is preparing to replace Keir Starmer as prime minister on July 20, another turnover in a revolving door that has produced seven British premiers in ten years. The instability itself is now part of the story, since it reflects how unsettled British politics has become under sustained economic and political pressure.
Burnham is building his early agenda around regional regeneration, transport investment, and public-private development, explicitly framing these as his answer to the rise of Reform UK. This is a direct response to years of discontent in regions that feel neglected by Westminster, and it bets that economic intervention, not just political messaging, is what will blunt Reform's appeal.
State steps in on steel as industrial policy hardens
The outgoing government has formally nationalized British Steel, previously owned by China's Jingye Group, arguing that domestic steel production is a matter of strategic national capability. This is a clear break from decades of hands-off industrial policy and marks one of the most significant state interventions in UK manufacturing in years.
The nationalization isn't an isolated move. It lands at the same moment as the leadership change, and together they point to a government, and an incoming one, willing to use state power more aggressively to shape economic outcomes rather than leaving them to the market.
British Steel's nationalization removes Chinese ownership from a strategically sensitive sector, reducing foreign control over domestic industrial capacity.
A more assertive economic model takes shape
Taken together, the leadership transition and the steel intervention point toward Britain moving toward a more interventionist economic posture. The emerging model favors industrial sovereignty, state-led investment, and regional revival over the more market-driven approach of previous governments.
This shift matters beyond Britain's borders. A G7 economy moving toward nationalization and state-directed regional investment gives other governments facing similar populist pressure a concrete example to point to, whether they intend to follow it or criticize it.
The challenge to the UK’s political elite
Reform UK's polling trajectory over the next few months will show whether economic nationalism is actually blunting its momentum or merely responding to it.
Sign up link: https://www.center-of-gravity.info
Inside Track: https://www.center-of-gravity.info/upgrade
Little Known RMD Strategy Allowed by the IRS
For investors with $1M+ in retirement accounts, the tax code allows specific strategies that can reduce your tax exposure once RMDs begin—but only if used before then.
The window is open for anyone within ten years of 73. A fiduciary advisor can review which may apply, at no cost.
What happened today:
622 - The Islamic calendar begins on 1 Muharram 1 AH. 1054 - Papal legates excommunicate Patriarch Michael Cerularius, symbolizing the East-West Schism. 1536 - Jacques Cartier returns to France after claiming the St. Lawrence region for the French Crown. 1790 - President George Washington signs the Residence Act selecting the Potomac as the permanent U.S. capital. 1931 - Emperor Haile Selassie promulgates Ethiopia’s first written constitution. 1945 - The United States conducts the Trinity test, the world’s first nuclear explosion. 1969 - Apollo 11 launches on the first mission to land humans on the Moon. 1979 - Saddam Hussein becomes president of Iraq following Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr’s resignation. 1990 - The Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic declares state sovereignty.
















