Viktor is an AI coworker that lives in Slack, right where your team already works.

Message Viktor like a teammate: "pull last quarter's revenue by channel," or "build a dashboard for our board meeting."

Viktor connects to your tools, does the work, and delivers the actual report, spreadsheet, or dashboard. Not a summary. The real thing.

There’s no new software to adopt and no one to train.

Most teams start with one task. Within a week, Viktor is handling half of their ops.

Add Viktor to Slack for free.

What you need to know

President Donald Trump's "clock is ticking" warning on 17 May marks a measurable hardening of the U.S. position, moving beyond diplomatic pressure toward an explicit threat of military action. Speaking alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing, Trump named two non-negotiable demands: no Iranian nuclear weapon and a reopened Strait of Hormuz. The White House is no longer signaling patience.

Pentagon tightens the blockade

U.S. Central Command is enforcing a physical blockade of shipping linked to Iranian ports, and the numbers are mounting. The coercive pressure is now operational, not merely rhetorical.

Diplomacy is stuck, military options are on the table

The State Department is still engaged: Secretary of State Marco Rubio has consulted British and Australian counterparts on restoring Hormuz navigation, framing any deal around preventing Iran from sprinting toward a nuclear weapon. But anonymous U.S. officials say Washington is simultaneously preparing military options. Trump is expected to meet senior national-security advisors in the Situation Room on Tuesday to weigh possible military action.

The gap between the two sides remains wide. Washington wants Iran to dismantle or sharply constrain its nuclear program and reopen Hormuz. Tehran wants the blockade lifted, sanctions relief, war-damage compensation and shipping guarantees. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi confirmed receipt of U.S. messages suggesting willingness to keep talking, but no breakthrough is in sight.

Gulf incidents are narrowing the diplomatic window

Fresh instability in the Gulf is making any deal harder to reach. A drone strike caused a fire at the UAE's Barakah nuclear power plant, with no injuries or radiological damage reported. The UAE called it a terrorist attack and reserved the right to respond. Saudi Arabia separately intercepted drones originating from Iraqi airspace.

Oil prices reflect escalation risk, not resolution

Markets are pricing in confrontation. WTI rose roughly 2.1-2.3% on Monday morning to around $107.60-$107.83 a barrel. Brent rose roughly 1.8-1.9% to around $111.18-$111.34. The move was driven by politics, not supply data.

Before the war, Hormuz handled approximately one-fifth of global oil and LNG shipments. With the strait still disrupted and U.S. rhetoric intensifying, traders are betting on further escalation rather than a near-term settlement. The question for markets is no longer whether talks resume; it is whether any deal can produce a credible, verifiable mechanism to reopen the strait.

A drone strike on Sunday 17 May caused a fire at an electrical generator outside the inner perimeter of the Barakah Nuclear Power Plant in Abu Dhabi's Al Dhafra Region, marking the first known direct strike on nuclear-adjacent infrastructure in the Gulf since the current regional confrontation escalated. Two of three drones that entered UAE airspace from the western border were intercepted; the third got through.

Emirati authorities and the Federal Authority for Nuclear Regulation confirmed there were no injuries, no radiological safety impact and no disruption to plant operations. The IAEA said it was monitoring the situation and expressed grave concern, calling for military restraint around nuclear facilities.

Why Barakah is a high-value target

Barakah is not a peripheral facility. Built with South Korean technology, it supplies roughly a quarter of the UAE's electricity and represents the country's entire civilian nuclear capacity. A strike that disables the plant, rather than an outlying generator, would constitute a major economic and strategic blow to Abu Dhabi.

Attribution is open, but the direction of fire is not

The UAE has not publicly attributed responsibility. The entry point, the western border, narrows the geometry of possible launch locations and points toward Yemen or Iraq-based actors with demonstrated drone range and previous targeting of Gulf energy infrastructure. Saudi Arabia separately intercepted three drones that entered from Iraqi airspace on the same day, a detail that points toward coordinated or concurrent operations.

The regional escalation ladder just moved up a rung

Attacks on Gulf oil infrastructure have been a recurring feature of the Iran-U.S.-Israel confrontation, but striking near a nuclear power plant crosses a threshold that previous operations avoided. Even a strike on peripheral infrastructure at a nuclear site raises the reputational and deterrence stakes for Abu Dhabi in ways that a refinery or port attack does not. The UAE has reserved the right to respond, and an investigation is underway to determine the origin of the drones.

Watch whether the UAE publicly attributes the attack and what response it signals. A named attribution would obligate a political or military reply and could draw Abu Dhabi more directly into a confrontation it has so far managed at arm's length.

Mohammad Baqr al-Saadi, a senior figure in the Iraqi Iran-aligned militia Kataeb Hezbollah, has reportedly been arrested in Türkiye and transferred to U.S. custody, according to regional sources. Al-Saadi is also said to operate under the name Mohammad Baqr Soleimani, a detail that points to deliberate alignment with Iran's Quds Force network.

If confirmed, the arrest represents one of the most significant captures of an Iran-backed militia leader outside the Iraq-Syria theater in recent years.

Who al-Saadi is and what he is accused of

Al-Saadi is alleged to have played an operational role in militia activities across Syria and Iraq, including around Aleppo, where Iran-backed forces were heavily engaged during the Syrian war. He is also accused of involvement in plotting attacks against U.S. and Jewish targets abroad, a charge that elevates the case beyond regional insurgency into international terrorism territory.

Kataeb Hezbollah's record with Washington

Kataeb Hezbollah is one of Iraq's most powerful Iran-aligned armed factions and has a long history of attacks on U.S. personnel and interests across the region. Washington has repeatedly designated the group and targeted its leadership, most visibly in the January 2020 strike that killed Iranian Quds Force commander Qasem Soleimani and Kataeb Hezbollah deputy Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis in Baghdad.

Türkiye's role is the operational signal to watch

The arrest's location matters as much as the target. Conducting a capture operation in Türkiye, a NATO member with its own complex relationships with Iran-aligned networks, points to either active Turkish cooperation with Washington or a unilateral U.S. rendition facilitated by intelligence access. Either scenario carries diplomatic weight. Watch for Ankara's response, or deliberate silence, as an indicator of how far that cooperation extends.

It’s the U.S. vs China, everyone needs to pick a side

Ukraine's largest drone strike on the Moscow region in over a year marks a deliberate shift in Kyiv's long-range strategy — from symbolic disruption to systemic targeting. The operation, reported May 17, signals that Ukraine is now trying to make Russia's war machine expensive to sustain, not just embarrassing to defend.

Russia's Defense Ministry claimed it intercepted 556 Ukrainian drones nationwide. At least four people were killed, including three in the Moscow region, per local officials cited by the Associated Press.

The target list tells the real story

Ukraine's Security Service said the strikes hit the Angstrom microelectronics plant in Zelenograd — described as a supplier of precision weapons components — and the Solnechnogorskaya pumping station, part of the oil pipeline network around Moscow. These are not symbolic targets. They are nodes in the logistics and production chain sustaining Russian offensive capacity.

The operation also debuted newly identified Ukrainian long-range systems, pointing to a maturing domestic strike industry.

Moscow's air defense image takes a hit

The Kremlin has invested heavily in layered air defenses around the capital. A strike that still reaches sensitive infrastructure, disrupts airports and causes casualties in the Moscow region undermines the domestic narrative of a protected rear. That political cost is part of Kyiv's calculus. It also gives Ukraine a retaliatory tool that doesn't depend on Western-supplied long-range systems.

President Zelenskyy framed the strikes as justified retaliation for Russia's recent large-scale bombardments of Ukrainian cities.

Escalation cycle already visible

Russia's likely response is more bombardment of Ukrainian cities — and it is already underway. Overnight into May 18, Russian forces struck Odesa, Dnipro, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson.

The eastern front remains a grinding war of attrition

On May 17, Ukraine's General Staff reported 242 combat engagements. Russian forces launched 112 airstrikes, dropped 316 guided bombs, deployed 8,065 kamikaze drones and carried out 2,716 attacks on Ukrainian positions and populated areas.

Pressure is heaviest in Donetsk and Zaporizhzhia, with no decisive shifts in either direction.

Two wars, one strategy

Russia is grinding forward in the east through mass fire and infantry pressure. Ukraine is simultaneously trying to convert Russian strategic depth from an asset into a liability. The Moscow strike alone doesn't shift the battlefield — but it signals that Kyiv intends to make the costs of Russia's offensive legible not only in Donetsk, but in the capital region the Kremlin has worked to keep insulated from the war. Watch whether Ukraine sustains this tempo or whether Western pressure to avoid escalation curtails the campaign.

Following President Donald Trump's meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, the White House announced a package of U.S.-China trade agreements covering aviation, agriculture, meat, poultry and critical minerals. The deals are paired with new institutional machinery designed to manage bilateral commercial friction before it escalates into broader confrontation.

The structural addition matters as much as the individual commitments. The two governments agreed to create a U.S.-China Board of Trade for non-sensitive goods and a U.S.-China Board of Investment for investment-related issues, giving both sides a standing dispute-resolution mechanism for the first time.

Boeing gets its first Chinese order since 2017

China approved an initial purchase of 200 American-made Boeing aircraft for Chinese airlines, the first such commitment since 2017. The deal reopens one of the world's largest aviation markets to a company whose China access has been effectively frozen by the broader deterioration in bilateral relations.

Agriculture locks in three years of guaranteed purchases

China committed to buy at least $17 billion a year in U.S. agricultural products in 2026, 2027 and 2028, with the 2026 figure prorated. The White House described these purchases as additional to soybean commitments China made in October 2025. For farm states exposed to years of Chinese retaliation and tariff uncertainty, the multi-year floor is a meaningful shift.

Critical minerals concessions address a core economic-security demand

China agreed to address U.S. concerns over supply-chain shortages in rare earths and critical minerals, and to ease restrictions on the sale of rare-earth production and processing equipment and technologies. The materials named span the full advanced-manufacturing supply chain.

Implementation is the entire question

Every element of this package, aircraft approvals, agricultural purchase targets, restored plant listings and rare-earth commitments, requires follow-through by Chinese regulators, state-linked buyers and commercial firms. The White House is presenting this as a reset, but the gap between announced commitments and delivered access has been a defining feature of previous U.S.-China trade deals. Xi's expected visit to Washington this fall provides a near-term checkpoint. Watch whether Chinese state buyers begin placing orders and whether rare-earth export controls are actually relaxed, or whether the institutional framework becomes a mechanism for managing expectations rather than changing behavior.

The new Monroe Doctrine & the Trump Corollary 

Alex Saab, the Colombian-born businessman described by U.S. prosecutors as a central financial operator for Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, has been deported from Venezuela to South Florida to face renewed criminal proceedings. The transfer marks a striking reversal: Saab was released by the U.S. in a 2023 prisoner exchange, celebrated by Caracas, and is now back in American custody after being arrested in Caracas earlier this year.

Venezuela's migration agency confirmed the handover. Representative Carlos Gimenez credited President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio for securing the transfer, saying the government now led by Delcy Rodríguez handed Saab over to face U.S. justice.

The charges waiting for him in Miami

Saab was first indicted in Miami in 2019 on eight counts related to money laundering. The Justice Department alleges he and an associate moved approximately $350 million out of Venezuela through the United States as part of a bribery scheme tied to state contracts. The charges remain allegations; defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty.

Why this case reaches beyond Venezuela

Saab's return matters to more than one investigation. Regional and Israeli-linked reporting has long accused him of maintaining financial ties to Hezbollah-linked networks in Latin America, claims that are more intelligence-driven than the formal indictment but have attracted serious attention from investigators tracking illicit finance, sanctions evasion and Iran-aligned networks across the region.

The witness value may exceed the charges

U.S. investigators regard Saab as a potentially significant witness against Maduro's inner circle. His alleged knowledge spans corruption networks, sanctions-evasion mechanisms and state-linked contracting, making his cooperation, if secured, far more valuable than a single money-laundering conviction. The willingness of Rodríguez's government to hand him over suggests Caracas calculated that the cost of holding him outweighed the benefit, a shift worth watching for what it reveals about the current state of U.S.-Venezuela leverage.

Move fast and break things

Ed Gallrein has pulled ahead of incumbent Representative Thomas Massie in late indicators ahead of the 19 May Republican primary in Kentucky's 4th District, turning a once long-shot challenge into the most consequential intra-party contest of the 2026 cycle. President Donald Trump has personally driven the effort, endorsing Gallrein and posting repeatedly against Massie over the weekend, calling him "the worst Republican congressman in history."

This is not a moderate versus conservative fight. Massie is one of the House's most ideologically conservative members. His vulnerability comes from defying Trump on spending, war powers and oversight, not from insufficient conservatism in the traditional sense.

What Massie did to earn Trump's wrath

Massie's breaks with the White House were substantive and public. He opposed Trump's tax-and-spending package, challenged the president's authority to strike Iran without congressional approval and helped push for the release of Epstein-related government files. Each of those moves targeted something Trump wanted to protect.

Record money poured into a single House seat

The spending figures have broken historical records and reframed what a House primary can look like financially.

The AIPAC playbook moves into the GOP

The spending structure mirrors the 2024 Democratic primaries in which outside money helped defeat Representatives Jamaal Bowman in New York's 16th District and Cori Bush in Missouri's 1st District. The Bowman race previously held the House primary ad-spend record at $25.2 million, including $14.5 million from AIPAC. The KY-04 race has now surpassed it, and the same donor network is central to the effort, this time operating inside the Republican Party.

What each outcome tells you about Trump's power

The result functions as a direct test of whether presidential pressure combined with aligned outside money can remove a deeply conservative but disloyal incumbent. A Gallrein win would confirm that the combination works, and would send a clear message to every House Republican weighing defiance on spending or war powers. A Massie survival would make him the clearest example to date of a Republican lawmaker enduring a full-scale Trump-backed purge and coming through it, a result that would complicate the deterrence logic the White House is trying to establish before the broader 2026 primary season.

Century Aluminum and Emirates Global Aluminium (EGA) are moving to build the first new primary aluminum smelter in the United States since 1980, targeting a facility in Inola, Oklahoma, east of Tulsa. The project is a direct response to Washington's push to rebuild domestic supply chains in critical materials, and it would more than double current U.S. primary aluminum output.

The power problem is the real constraint

A 750,000-tonne-per-year smelter would consume roughly 10.5 to 11 terawatt-hours of electricity annually, assuming approximately 14 megawatt-hours per tonne of primary aluminum. That is comparable to the annual electricity consumption of a major U.S. city. The availability of long-term, competitively priced power, not tariffs or capital alone, is why domestic smelting capacity collapsed in the first place.

45 years of industrial retreat in one number

The scale of the decline that this project is attempting to reverse is considerable. The U.S. once operated 33 primary aluminum smelters with combined annual capacity of roughly 4.6 million to nearly 5 million tonnes. Today only a handful remain operational, producing an estimated 680,000 to 700,000 tonnes a year.

Strategic logic goes well beyond jobs

Aluminum feeds aerospace, automotive, construction, packaging and defense supply chains. Washington's drive to reduce dependence on imported critical materials gives this project political backing that goes beyond industrial policy. The Inola facility, if completed, would be the largest primary aluminum plant ever built in the United States.

Watch these risks before 2030

The project's viability rests on three variables that remain unresolved: securing a long-term power contract at competitive rates in Oklahoma, sustained tariff protection that makes domestic production cost-competitive against Gulf and Chinese producers, and construction execution over a multi-year build cycle. If any one of those conditions slips, the economics of the joint venture shift materially. The 2030 production target leaves limited margin for delay.

Instability from Sahel to Horn of Africa amid state fragility, Russian interference, & Islamist insurgencies

U.S. and Nigeria kill senior Islamic State figure in Lake Chad raid

U.S. and Nigerian special operations forces killed Abu Bilal al-Minuki, a senior Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) commander, in a helicopter-borne raid on a compound in Metele, Borno State, northeastern Nigeria. Both President Donald Trump and Nigerian President Bola Ahmed Tinubu publicly confirmed the operation, with Trump describing it as a major counterterrorism success.

The raid is one of the most significant publicly acknowledged U.S.-Nigerian joint operations in the Lake Chad Basin in recent years, and it reflects an active U.S. special operations presence in West Africa that has received relatively little public attention.

How the operation unfolded

Approximately two dozen U.S. and Nigerian special forces conducted a helicopter assault on al-Minuki's compound. They met armed resistance and fought on the ground for nearly three hours before air assets struck the site, killing the remaining militants. Nigerian officials reported no casualties or equipment losses on either side.

Who al-Minuki was, and why the ranking dispute matters

Trump described al-Minuki as the Islamic State's "second-in-command." U.S. Africa Command identified him as the group's "director of global operations." Some analysts have urged caution over those designations, noting that al-Minuki was better established as a senior ISWAP and Islamic State external-operations figure than as a publicly documented global deputy leader. The distinction matters for assessing the true operational impact of his death.

The Long War Journal reported that a UN monitoring team had linked al-Minuki to the Islamic State's Al Furqan office, which coordinates activity and financing across West Africa, North Africa, the Sahel and Sudan. That role, whatever his precise title, made him a node in a transnational network, not merely a local commander.

ISWAP's resilience is the baseline assumption

ISWAP emerged from Boko Haram's insurgency and has maintained a durable presence around Lake Chad, exploiting islands, rural terrain and porous borders across Nigeria, Niger, Chad and Cameroon to attack both military positions and civilians. The group has absorbed and recovered from leadership losses repeatedly. Al-Minuki's death will likely disrupt parts of ISWAP's command structure in the near term, but the group's decentralized structure limits the strategic impact of any single killing.

What to expect

The operation raises two forward-looking questions. First, whether U.S. Africa Command intensifies its operational tempo in the Lake Chad Basin, using this raid as a template for further targeted strikes. Second, whether ISWAP responds with retaliatory attacks on Nigerian military or civilian targets, as it has done following previous leadership losses. The group's capacity to reconstitute around new figures, and to exploit ungoverned terrain along four national borders, remains the central constraint on any counterterrorism strategy in the region.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared the Ebola Bundibugyo outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Uganda a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. The declaration follows a cluster of cases concentrated in Ituri Province, in eastern DRC, across the Bunia, Rwampara and Mongbwalu health zones. WHO figures from 16 May recorded eight laboratory-confirmed cases, 246 suspected cases and 80 suspected deaths. Uganda has reported two confirmed imported cases in Kampala, including one death, among travelers from DRC.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's situation summary of 17 May gives slightly higher working figures: 10 confirmed cases and 336 suspected cases, including 88 deaths, in DRC; and two confirmed cases, including one death, in Uganda, with no further reported spread there. The CDC cautions that these figures are likely to change as surveillance improves.

The strain in question matters considerably. This is Ebola caused by the Bundibugyo virus, not the Zaire ebolavirus strain for which licensed vaccines exist. WHO notes there is no licensed vaccine or specific treatment for Bundibugyo virus, though early supportive care can be lifesaving. Past Bundibugyo outbreaks have carried case-fatality rates of roughly 30-50%; the CDC puts the historical range at 25-50%.

The concern is not that Ebola spreads in the manner of COVID-19. It does not. WHO states that Ebola is transmitted through direct contact with the blood or bodily fluids of infected people, or with contaminated materials such as bedding or clothing. The more pressing worry is that this outbreak appears to involve community deaths, health workers and cross-border movement, in a region already compromised by insecurity and weak health infrastructure. WHO's Africa office has noted that the DRC outbreak includes 80 suspected community deaths, with some patients deteriorating rapidly.

The immediate risk is greatest in eastern DRC, Uganda and neighboring countries with heavy travel links, among them South Sudan, Rwanda, Burundi and Tanzania. The outbreak remains concentrated in DRC, with confirmed imported cases in Uganda and active monitoring under way in South Sudan. WHO has cautioned that the true scale of infections and the geographic spread remain uncertain.

The risk of a large regional outbreak is real; the risk of a global pandemic remains low for now. The principal dangers are delayed detection, unsafe burials, infections among health workers and movement from Ituri into urban centers such as Kampala, Goma or Kinshasa. The indicators to watch most closely over the coming week are confirmed cases outside Ituri, evidence of local transmission in Kampala, new infections among health workers, unidentified transmission chains and whether neighboring states begin reporting suspected or confirmed cases.

Center of Gravity sign up link: https://www.namea-group.com/the-daily-brief/