In partnership with
The Last Time Stocks Were This Expensive Was December 1999.
"Right now, it's good. But it was in '72, '86, 2000, and 2007." - Jamie Dimon, May 2026.
The Shiller CAPE ratio just hit 42.3. The only time in 140 years it's been higher? December 1999.
Stocks can stay expensive for a long time...
It’s one metric to consider, but when your portfolio is built around the most expensive equities in modern history, what else you diversify with could really matter.
Blue-chip contemporary and post war art has shown near-zero correlation with the S&P since 1995.* Prices are largely driven by private collectors competing for a fixed supply of artwork by artists like Banksy, Basquiat, and Picasso.
Masterworks lets you invest in shares of that market.
$1.3B deployed across 500+ artworks
29 exits to date
Net annualized returns like 16.5%, 17.6%, and 17.8%, not including those unsold
*According to Masterworks data. Investing involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. See important Reg A disclosures at masterworks.com/cd.
- The Bank of International Settlements has recast the AI investment boom as a potential financial-stability risk, warning that more than $1 trillion in projected hyperscaler capex in 2025–26 is outrunning cash flow and pushing risk into opaque financing links between labs, chipmakers, cloud firms, data-center developers and private credit. - A revenue shortfall could trigger a broad repricing, amplified by high household equity exposure and limited policy space. - In Washington, the Supreme Court gave Trump two near-term defeats, on mail ballots and Fed Governor Lisa Cook, but a lasting win in Trump v. Slaughter, greatly expanding presidential control over independent agencies while carving out the Fed. - In Ukraine, Russia is pressing Kostiantynivka and the Donetsk front, while Kyiv’s deep strikes on Russian refineries and logistics are creating fuel shortages and widening the war’s geography. - The U.S.-Iran conflict has settled into an armed pause, with Doha diplomacy strained by disputes over Hormuz, sanctions, frozen funds and renewed tanker strikes. - Israel is maintaining its own Iran and Lebanon track, including preparations for an independent strike option. - In Monaco, a suspected parcel bomb critically injured two adults and wounded a child, raising questions over whether a Ukrainian businessman was deliberately targeted. |
Center of Gravity
What you need to know
BIS elevates AI spending boom to financial stability threat
The Bank for International Settlements used its Annual Economic Report to formally designate the AI investment surge as a macroeconomic and financial stability variable, not merely a technology sector story.
The BIS rarely uses its annual report to flag speculative risks, making this an unusual and deliberate warning to policymakers and regulators.
$1 trillion in capex is outrunning cash flow
The five largest AI-focused hyperscalers are projected to spend over $1 trillion on AI-related capital expenditure across 2025 and 2026. That spending is increasingly running ahead of earnings and free cash flow, pushing firms and their suppliers toward heavier debt loads and complex financing structures.
The winner-takes-most dynamic is the key accelerant. If firms believe only a handful of players will dominate, each has a rational incentive to keep spending even as collective overinvestment grows across the sector.
Opaque financing structures are hiding where risk sits
AI labs, chipmakers, hyperscalers, and neocloud providers are increasingly interconnected through private deals, equity stakes, long-term purchase commitments, and data-center leasebacks. The BIS warns these arrangements make it difficult for investors and regulators to locate ultimate risk exposure.
If hyperscalers slow investment, the credit stress would extend well beyond big tech.
At risk: chipmakers, data-center developers, cloud providers, construction firms, energy suppliers, and fixed-income lenders with AI supply chain exposure.
Household equity exposure amplifies any correction
Equity valuations remain elevated for companies at the center of the AI trade, while investor risk premiums have narrowed. Households now hold greater equity exposure than in prior decades, meaning a sharp repricing would hit consumption and confidence more directly than past tech corrections did.
The BIS drew explicit historical parallels with the canal boom of the 1830s, the British railway boom of the 1840s, electrification in the 1920s, and the dotcom bubble of the late 1990s. Each involved a real technological advance followed by excessive investment and a painful correction.
Policymakers have less room to respond than before
The BIS is not calling for immediate monetary tightening. It is arguing that the combination of high public debt, fragile sovereign-bond markets, elevated inflation, and growing non-bank leverage has already narrowed policymakers' options if a correction hits.
The institution specifically flagged hedge funds, private credit, and other non-bank institutions as requiring stronger oversight given their growing role in financing AI-adjacent activity.
What to watch
The BIS's central scenario is not a guaranteed bust but a conditional one: if AI revenue growth fails to meet the scale and speed that current spending implies, the financial system faces a serious and broad repricing. The technology may still deliver long-run productivity gains, but the timing mismatch between capital deployed now and returns arriving later is the core vulnerability.
Near-term indicators to monitor: hyperscaler earnings guidance versus capex commitments, credit conditions for mid-tier AI suppliers, and any tightening in private financing structures linking labs and cloud providers.
A sustained slowdown in AI revenue growth would be the clearest trigger for a disorderly unwind.
Known Unknowns: The impact of U.S. tariffs on international trade & especially the U.S. bond market. Whether U.S./Israel war on Iran will return to high intensity operations. What impact this war will have on the global economy. Relations of new Syrian government with Israel, international community & ability to maintain stability inside Syria. China’s triggers for military action against Taiwan. U.S. and allied responses to China’s ‘grey zone’ warfare in the South China Sea and north Asia. Ukraine’s ability to withstand Russia’s war of attrition. The potential for the jihadist insurgency in Africa’s Sahel region to consolidate and spread.
Trump Administration
Move fast and break things
Court hands Trump a split verdict with one lasting structural win
The Supreme Court delivered President Donald Trump two defeats and one major victory Monday, with the mail-ballot and Federal Reserve rulings checking him in the near term while a third decision permanently expands presidential power over independent agencies.
The split outcome leaves Trump constrained on election administration and monetary policy but structurally stronger over the regulatory state.
Mail-ballot ruling blocks a core GOP election ask
The Court rejected a Republican-backed challenge to grace-period mail-ballot laws in a 5-4 decision, upholding Mississippi's rule that counts absentee ballots postmarked by Election Day if received within five business days. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court's three liberal justices. The ruling preserves similar laws nationwide and defeats a Trump and Republican National Committee push to require all federal mail ballots received by Election Day itself.
The decision protects ballot access ahead of the 2026 midterms for groups most reliant on mail delays.
Affected groups include elderly voters, disabled voters, military personnel, and overseas citizens.
Fed governor keeps her seat, for now
The Court refused to let Trump immediately remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook while her legal challenge proceeds, ruling 5-4 with Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh joining the liberal bloc. Cook, appointed by President Joe Biden and the first Black woman on the Fed board, was targeted over disputed mortgage-fraud allegations she denies. The ruling keeps her removal protections intact and blocks an immediate test of presidential reach into the central bank.
The stakes extend beyond Cook. Fed governors serve staggered 14-year terms, and removal without cause would have opened the door to direct White House influence over interest-rate policy.
Trump v. Slaughter guts a 90-year-old precedent
The Court's 6-3 ruling in Trump v. Slaughter upholds Trump's firing of Democratic FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter and strikes down the FTC's for-cause removal protection. The decision overturns the central holding of Humphrey's Executor, the 1935 precedent that let Congress shield independent-agency leaders from at-will presidential removal. The majority reasoned that agencies wielding substantial executive power must answer directly to the president.
The ruling reaches well beyond the FTC.
Agencies affected include the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board, both of which relied on the same removal-protection model.
The Fed carve-out is the catch
The Court explicitly distinguished the Federal Reserve from other independent agencies, citing its unique historical and institutional status, even as it dismantled removal protections elsewhere. That carve-out is why Cook keeps her job today while Slaughter does not. It also means the structural expansion of presidential power stops short of the one agency most likely to trigger market panic if politicized.
The impact
The Slaughter ruling is the lasting story: future presidents now have broad authority to fire leaders of multi-member regulatory agencies without cause, reshaping how independent the administrative state can be.
The mail-ballot and Cook rulings are near-term defeats for Trump but leave both fights alive on narrower procedural grounds.
Cold War 2.0
It’s the U.S. vs China, everyone needs to pick a side
The Ukraine war splits into two fronts: trenches and refineries
Russia's invasion of Ukraine has entered a harder attritional phase defined by two competing dynamics. Moscow is grinding forward on the ground in Donetsk, while Kyiv is reaching deep into Russian territory to disrupt fuel and logistics infrastructure far from the front line. Neither side is positioned for a decisive conventional breakthrough.
Kostiantynivka becomes the pressure point in Donetsk
Russian forces are pushing small assault groups into the outskirts of Kostiantynivka, a key city on the southern edge of Ukraine's defensive "fortress belt," backed by artillery, drones, and guided bombs.
Ukraine has not suffered a major front-line collapse, and Russian gains remain slow and costly, but the fight is intensifying as Moscow tries to convert local advances into a wider breach of Ukrainian defenses.
Russian President Vladimir Putin reaffirmed on June 28 that Moscow intends to seize the rest of four Ukrainian regions it claims as its own.
Regions claimed: Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson.
The Kremlin's peace terms remain unchanged: Ukrainian withdrawal from those regions and a formal renunciation of NATO membership. Kyiv rejects both as illegal.
Strikes on Ukrainian cities continue alongside the ground war
Russian strikes killed at least 12 civilians and wounded dozens more on June 29 across multiple Ukrainian cities, with power cuts compounding the damage as summer heat drives up electricity demand.
Cities hit include Dnipro, Zaporizhzhia, Sumy, and Kharkiv.
Ukraine's deep strikes are the real story of the week
The most consequential development isn't on the front line. Ukrainian drone and missile strikes on Russian refineries, fuel infrastructure, and logistics nodes are producing fuel shortages across multiple Russian regions, forcing Moscow to defend assets deep inside its own territory while sustaining offensive operations abroad.
Fuel shortages are hitting southern Russia, Siberia, occupied Crimea, and areas near Moscow.
Crimea is the most acute case: authorities have restricted private gasoline sales and curtailed transport and business activity.
President Volodymyr Zelensky says Kyiv is deliberately targeting facilities that sustain Russia's war effort, framing the strikes as imposing a domestic cost on Moscow.
The battlefield is becoming structurally asymmetric
Russia retains enough manpower and firepower to advance in selected sectors, particularly Donetsk, but Ukraine is increasingly using precision strikes to degrade the systems that sustain that advance rather than matching Russia on the ground.
The war's economic and strategic geography is widening as a result, with Moscow now forced to split resources between front-line offense and rear-area defense across a front line of roughly 1,200 kilometers (746 miles).
Diplomacy is stalled and Europe is hedging
Moscow has rejected Ukrainian proposals to limit long-range strikes, and Kyiv says Russia's terms still amount to capitulation. There is no active ceasefire track. European governments are meanwhile preparing for a more self-reliant defense posture ahead of the NATO summit in Ankara, with growing investment in drones, air defense, electronic warfare, and long-range precision strike.
NATO summit dates: July 7 to 8, Ankara.
The war is accelerating European industrial cooperation on mass production of cheaper battlefield systems.
What we should expect to see in the near term
Expect continued fighting around Kostiantynivka and the wider Donetsk front, paired with an expanding Ukrainian strike campaign against Russian energy and military-industrial targets. The near-term trajectory favors incremental Russian territorial gains offset by rising domestic costs inside Russia, with zero diplomatic off-ramp in sight.
The Middle East
Birthplace of civilization
U.S.-Iran war settles into fragile pause as Doha diplomacy strains
The U.S.-Iran war continues as an armed pause rather than peace. The June 17 memorandum remains the formal framework, but renewed strikes around the Strait of Hormuz and conflicting messages from Washington and Tehran show how easily the truce could collapse.
Washington and Tehran disagree on what Doha even is
President Donald Trump says Iran requested the upcoming Doha meeting, and the White House expects U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff and presidential advisor Jared Kushner in Qatar, with technical talks possible on the sidelines.
Iran's Foreign Ministry rejects that framing outright, insisting its delegation will discuss only implementation of the existing memorandum, not direct negotiations with the U.S. side.
Tehran says it will hold no negotiating meetings with Washington "at any level" in the coming days.
Iran ties any final agreement to prior commitments being honored first.
Conditions include oil-export permissions, access to frozen funds, and de-escalation measures.
Hormuz strikes exposed how thin the truce is
Iran struck the Singapore-flagged M/V Ever Lovely with a one-way attack drone on June 25, according to U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), prompting U.S. strikes on Iranian missile, drone-storage, and coastal-radar sites the next day. Iran then struck the Panama-flagged M/T Kiku on June 27, triggering a second round of U.S. strikes on Iranian surveillance, communications, air-defense, drone-storage, and mine-laying capabilities.
Iran reportedly launched missiles and drones at U.S. military sites in Kuwait and Bahrain on June 28.
U.S. officials said both sides have since agreed to stand down for now.
Shipping through Hormuz is the clearest stress gauge
Washington insists the strait stay open with vessels moving freely under the memorandum, while Iran wants to retain control over routing, maritime coordination, and demining.
Traffic continues but well below normal volume, making crossing counts a real-time proxy for how the truce is holding.
Crossings fell to 22 on June 28, the slowest day since the preliminary deal.
Total crossings from June 26 to 28 numbered 108.
Israel is running its own track, separate from Washington's
Israeli officials have distanced themselves from the U.S.-Iran memorandum and continue tying regional de-escalation to Hezbollah's disarmament in Lebanon. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says Israeli forces will stay in southern Lebanon until Hezbollah and other armed groups no longer pose a threat, keeping a second front open regardless of Doha's outcome.
Israel is preparing a go-it-alone military option against Iran
Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said on June 29 that he has instructed the Israel Defense Forces to prepare a "blue-and-white" operation, meaning an Israeli-only strike option against Iran. Katz said Israel does not want to disrupt Trump's diplomatic effort but warned that any Iranian missile fire on Israel will draw a forceful Israeli response.
Managed instability with peaks and troughs
The near-term outlook is managed instability, not peace. Doha may give Washington a diplomatic showcase and Tehran a narrow implementation track, but core disputes over Hormuz control, sanctions relief, frozen assets, nuclear restrictions, and Israel's Lebanon demands remain unresolved. Watch shipping volumes through Hormuz and any new strike on tankers or military sites as the leading indicators of whether the pause holds or the next violation restarts the escalation cycle.
Watchlist
Parcel bomb attack breaches Monaco's rare-violence record
A suspected parcel bomb exploded outside a residential building in Monaco on Monday night, critically injuring two adults and a child in an attack officials call unprecedented for the tightly policed microstate.
No group has claimed responsibility, and authorities have not classified it as terrorism, but the working assessment points to a targeted attack.
The blast and the manhunt
The explosion struck shortly before 9 p.m. on June 29 near Rue Révérend-Père-Louis-Frolla, close to Monaco's border with the French town of Beausoleil. Monaco Minister of State Christophe Mirmand said two adults suffered life-threatening injuries while a 13-year-old child was less seriously hurt, with emergency crews from both Monaco and France responding.
Surveillance footage reportedly shows a man leaving a backpack or package at the building entrance before fleeing on foot into France.
Monaco's prosecutor general, Stéphane Thibault, has classified the device as a parcel bomb, with investigators now tracing the suspect's route through Monaco and Beausoleil camera networks.
The Ukrainian businessman at the center of it
French and Ukrainian media identified one of the critically injured adults as Vadym Iermolaiev, a Ukrainian construction and property businessman.
Iermolaiev was sanctioned by Ukraine in 2023 over alleged Russia links though authorities have not established any motive connecting that history to Monday's attack.
Officials call it deliberate, not random
Mirmand said the evidence points to a deliberate attack and that the device appeared designed to cause injury, but he stopped short of saying whether the victims were specifically targeted or the building was chosen for another reason. That gap between "deliberate" and "targeted" is the key open question shaping the investigation.
Cross-border response moves fast
Prince Albert II condemned the explosion as an "odious act," and French police confirmed they are assisting Monaco's authorities in the search. Nice Mayor Éric Ciotti called the attack "a tragedy for Monaco" and offered support to victims and emergency responders.
Monaco's dense surveillance network and its direct border with France are expected to be central to identifying the suspect.
The investigation's near-term trajectory depends on whether camera footage yields a suspect identification and whether French authorities can intercept movement across the Beausoleil border.
A confirmed link to Iermolaiev's sanctioned status or business dealings would shift the case from a security anomaly to a geopolitically sensitive inquiry, given Monaco's role as a haven for wealthy individuals with cross-border financial and political exposure.
Sign up link: https://www.center-of-gravity.info
Inside Track: https://www.center-of-gravity.info/upgrade
Claude vs Gemini. OpenAI vs Anthropic. Which lab ships next? Real money on all of it. Kalshi is the CFTC-regulated prediction market for tech readers. Trade what you know.
What happened today:
1520 - Spanish conquistadors flee Tenochtitlan during La Noche Triste. 1922 - Hughes-Peynado Agreement signed to end the U.S. occupation of the Dominican Republic. 1934 - Adolf Hitler launches the Night of the Long Knives. 1936 - Haile Selassie appeals to the League of Nations against Italy’s invasion of Ethiopia. 1940 - Nazi Germany begins occupation of the Channel Islands. 1950 - President Harry Truman authorizes U.S. ground forces for the Korean War. 1960 - Belgian Congo gains independence from Belgium. 1971 - U.S. Supreme Court clears publication of the Pentagon Papers. 1985 - TWA Flight 847 hostages freed in Beirut. 1989 - Omar al-Bashir coup overthrows Sudan’s elected government. 2012 - Mohamed Morsi sworn in as Egypt’s first freely elected president. 2019 - Donald Trump becomes the first sitting U.S. president to enter North Korea. 2020 - Hong Kong National Security Law comes into force.
